4 total
A corporation is entitled to enhanced refund interest on overpayments from reversed tax reassessments.
The appellant, Stonehouse Group Inc., appealed a motion judge's decision denying enhanced refund interest on an overpayment of provincial tax.
The overpayment resulted from a disallowed loss carry back under the Corporations Tax Act, which was later reversed.
The motion judge interpreted s. 79(7) of the Act as precluding enhanced interest for loss carry back refunds.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, finding the motion judge's interpretation incorrect.
The Court held that such an interpretation would unfairly deny any refund interest, contrary to the legislative intent of the interest payment provisions, which aimed to balance the rights of government and taxpayers and provide enhanced interest for compelled overpayments arising from disputes.
Summary judgment granted declaring Minister's tax reassessment for excess refund statute-barred under the Corporations Tax Act.
The moving party, Ford, sought summary judgment on its appeal of a tax reassessment by the Minister of Finance.
The Minister had issued a Notice of Assessment in 2017 seeking repayment of an excess refund of over $6.2 million from the 1999 taxation year.
Ford argued the reassessment was statute-barred under subsection 82(11) of the Corporations Tax Act.
The court agreed, finding that unlike other provisions, subsection 82(11) did not include the phrase 'at any time,' meaning the normal assessment period applied.
The court granted summary judgment in favour of Ford, declaring the reassessment statute-barred.
Enhanced tax refund interest rate does not apply to refunds arising from loss carry-backs.
The appellant corporation claimed a tax refund resulting from carrying back non-capital losses to a previous taxation year.
After a successful objection to a reassessment, the appellant received the refund but was denied the enhanced rate of interest under s. 82(5) of the Corporations Tax Act.
The appellant brought a Rule 21 motion to determine whether 'tax payable' under s. 82(5) must take into account a deduction from a loss carried back.
The court answered the question in the negative, finding that the specific deeming provision in s. 79(7) applies to the calculation of interest under s. 82(5), meaning tax payable is calculated without regard to subsequent year tax losses.
The appeal was effectively dismissed in favour of the respondent Crown.
Conditional discharge granted in tax‑driven bankruptcy with structured repayment conditions.
A bankrupt sought relief in a contested discharge proceeding arising from significant personal income tax debt exceeding one million dollars.
The bankrupt argued that procedural delays and lack of disclosure by the opposing creditor violated section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and sought a remedy under section 24(1).
The court rejected the Charter arguments but held that procedural fairness required that a bankrupt know the case to be met when a creditor opposes discharge.
Exercising its discretion under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, the court granted a conditional discharge requiring payment of $105,000 plus a structured income‑based payment obligation capped at $183,000 over ten years.
The court reduced the percentage typically required in tax‑driven bankruptcies in light of delay, disclosure concerns, and the circumstances in which the tax debt arose.
