2 total
Supplier’s request for direct payment not unlawful interference with contractual relations.
A Small Claims Court trial concerning an unpaid invoice and a defendant’s claim alleging breach of contract and intentional interference with economic relations.
The plaintiff manufacturer sought payment for parts produced and delivered, while the defendant alleged the plaintiff wrongfully interfered with its contractual relationship with a third-party customer and caused loss of profits and reputational damage.
The court found the parties had agreed to change payment terms to COD and that the defendant breached that agreement.
The court held that the plaintiff’s approach to the third party seeking payment was not unlawful interference and that the defendant failed to prove causation of alleged losses.
The defendant’s claim was dismissed and judgment was granted for the plaintiff on the unpaid account with interest and costs.
Consent order issued imposing terms and conditions on motor vehicle dealer registrations.
The Registrar issued a Notice of Proposal to refuse and revoke the registrations of the applicants under the Motor Vehicle Dealers Act, 2002.
The parties reached a settlement and requested a consent order without a hearing pursuant to section 4.1 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act.
The Licence Appeal Tribunal issued the consent order, incorporating the agreed terms and conditions which permit the applicants' registration subject to strict compliance, disclosure, and operational requirements.