The accused was tried on a twelve-count indictment arising from allegations of repeated domestic violence against his intimate partner.
The evidence included testimony from the complainant, a supporting witness, and medical records documenting injuries including a fractured jaw, kidney laceration, spinal fractures, and extensive bruising.
The court assessed credibility under the W.(D.) framework and considered the dynamics of domestic abuse, including delayed disclosure and continued contact with the accused.
The judge held that the jaw fracture did not meet the legal definition of “wounding” because the evidence did not establish a break in the skin or tissue, but it constituted assault causing bodily harm.
The court convicted the accused on multiple counts including aggravated assault relating to a kidney injury, assault with a weapon, sexual assault with a weapon, uttering threats, forcible confinement, and related offences, while acquitting on some counts where reasonable doubt remained.
