Angie Tracey

The applicant condominium owner and the respondent condominium corporation reached a settlement regarding a records request dispute.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal issued a consent order resolving the matter.

The corporation acknowledged its failure to respond within the statutory 30-day timeframe and agreed to provide the requested records, including meeting minutes and financial statements, free of charge.

The corporation was also ordered to reimburse the applicant's filing fees and pay a penalty.

The applicant condominium corporation and the respondent unit owners reached a settlement in Stage 2 Mediation regarding a noise and vibration dispute involving the owners' tenant.

The parties agreed that the tenant created unreasonable noise in violation of the Condominium Act, 1998 and the corporation's rules, and that the unit owners are responsible for the nuisance.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal issued a consent order requiring the respondents to comply with the governing documents and ordering the unit owners to reimburse the corporation $8,552.60 for legal costs.

The applicant condominium owner filed an application alleging the respondent corporation failed to enforce a rule restricting visitor parking to visitors only.

Prior to the hearing, the corporation amended its rules to permit residents to park in visitor parking under certain circumstances.

As the rule in question was superseded, the Tribunal found it no longer had jurisdiction over the matter and dismissed the application without costs on consent of the parties.

The applicant condominium corporation filed an application against a unit owner regarding a dog in the unit, which allegedly violated the condominium's rules.

During the proceedings, it was discovered that the named respondent owner had been deceased for nine years and the unit was occupied by a tenant who had not been properly added as an intervenor.

The Tribunal dismissed the application under Rule 4 of its Rules of Practice, directing the applicant to confirm the current owners and properly add the tenant as a party before refiling.

The applicant condominium corporation applied to the Condominium Authority Tribunal alleging the respondent unit owner breached a prior settlement agreement.

The applicant claimed the respondent's guests stole food deliveries intended for other residents and that the respondent created unreasonable noise.

The Tribunal found it had jurisdiction over the food delivery issue as it constituted an unreasonable interference with the common elements.

The Tribunal concluded the respondent breached the agreement regarding the food deliveries and ordered compliance, but dismissed the noise complaints due to insufficient objective evidence.

The applicant was awarded $125 for Tribunal fees.

The applicant condominium owner filed an application alleging the respondent condominium corporation breached a settlement agreement by failing to provide required records on time and by disclosing confidential settlement details in a meeting package.

The Tribunal found that the corporation breached the agreement by providing a tax record late and by disclosing the settlement payment amount to other owners.

The Tribunal cautioned the corporation regarding confidentiality but declined to order a penalty or formal apology.

The corporation was ordered to reimburse the applicant's $125 filing fee.

The applicant, a condominium unit owner, brought an application before the Condominium Authority Tribunal regarding a request for core and non-core records.

The Tribunal found that the respondent condominium corporation provided some records adequately but refused to provide unapproved board minutes and the most recent reserve fund study without reasonable excuse.

The Tribunal ordered the production of the outstanding records, subject to the applicant paying reasonable estimated fees for certain non-core records.

Given the respondent's history of non-compliance in previous Tribunal proceedings, the Tribunal imposed a $2,000 penalty and awarded $200 in costs to the applicant.

The applicant, a condominium owner, filed a case with the Condominium Authority Tribunal alleging the respondent condominium corporation failed to provide requested records, including meeting minutes, financial statements, and an AGM audio recording.

The Tribunal found that while the respondent eventually provided most records during the hearing, it initially refused several without a reasonable excuse.

The Tribunal ordered the respondent to verify and produce the final approved shared facility minutes and the AGM audio recording if they exist.

The Tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay a $1,000 penalty for its failure to provide records without reasonable excuse, awarded $200 in costs to the applicant, and mandated that the condominium board complete corporate records training.