Jason Nassr, convicted by a jury, applied for a stay of proceedings under s. 24(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, alleging a breach of his s. 11(b) right to a trial within a reasonable time.
The total delay from arrest to verdict was 30.48 months, slightly exceeding the 30-month presumptive ceiling set by R. v. Jordan.
The court analyzed periods of delay, attributing some to defence actions (e.g., unavailability, late objections) and some to exceptional circumstances (e.g., Truth and Reconciliation Day holiday, unforeseen preliminary hearing extension, COVID-19 backlog).
After deductions, the net delay was found to be below the 30-month ceiling.
The court also rejected the argument for an "under-the-ceiling" breach, noting the applicant's lack of timely action to expedite proceedings and the case's complexity due to self-representation and voluminous disclosure.
The application for a stay of proceedings was dismissed.