Andre

The respondent brought a motion to suspend his interim spousal support obligations, claiming a material change in circumstances due to his retirement and a significant reduction in income.

The applicant opposed the motion and brought a cross-motion for an increase in support and an advance from the sale of the matrimonial home.

The court found the respondent's financial disclosure lacking credibility and dismissed his motion to suspend support.

The court ordered that both parties receive $100,000 from the net proceeds of the sale of the matrimonial home.

The applicant mother sought retroactive child support, section 7 expenses, imputation of income, property division, and a restraining order following the parties' separation.

The court found the respondent father was intentionally under-employed and had hidden cash income, imputing his income at $40,000.

The court ordered retroactive child support, directed the sale or buyout of a jointly owned property, and issued a restraining order due to the respondent's history of domestic violence and ongoing hostility.

The accused was charged with fraud after the complainant gave her $23,643 for investment purposes.

The Crown alleged the accused falsely represented that her company was affiliated with an established financial group and guaranteed the initial deposit against loss.

The court found that the accused intentionally misled the complainant, deposited the funds into her own account, and immediately withdrew the money without investing it.

The accused was found guilty of fraud.