The respondent brought a motion to suspend his interim spousal support obligations, claiming a material change in circumstances due to his retirement and a significant reduction in income.
The applicant opposed the motion and brought a cross-motion for an increase in support and an advance from the sale of the matrimonial home.
The court found the respondent's financial disclosure lacking credibility and dismissed his motion to suspend support.
The court ordered that both parties receive $100,000 from the net proceeds of the sale of the matrimonial home.
