A. Nagra

The offender was convicted by a jury of second degree murder and unauthorized possession of a loaded restricted firearm after fatally shooting the victim in a restaurant.

The court rejected the offender's claim that he acted in self-defence, finding his belief that the victim posed a threat was unreasonable and unfounded.

Balancing the aggravating factor of using an illegal handgun in a public place against the offender's lack of a prior record and good prospects for rehabilitation, the court imposed a life sentence with parole ineligibility set at 12 years, along with a concurrent five-year sentence for the firearms offence.

During a jury trial for second-degree murder and firearms offences arising from a shootout at a restaurant, the court ruled on the admissibility of the criminal records and police occurrence reports of one of the co-accused, the deceased, and the other co-accused.

The court excluded the co-accused's criminal record, finding its prejudicial effect substantially outweighed its limited probative value regarding credibility and self-defence.

The court admitted the deceased's criminal record and related occurrence reports, as they were relevant to the accused's claim of self-defence and their probative value was not substantially outweighed by their prejudicial effect.

The court excluded double hearsay occurrence reports and unproven police synopses relating to the accused.