In a family law motion, the applicant sought findings of contempt relating to alleged breaches of prior court orders concerning property retrieval, vehicle maintenance obligations, and parenting exchange arrangements.
The court found the respondent in contempt for deliberately withholding certain listed household items contrary to a prior order requiring their surrender, but declined to find contempt regarding alleged failure to service a vehicle because the order was ambiguous and primarily required payment of operating expenses.
The court imposed a reduced monetary fine and directed the parties to arrange completion of the property transfer.
Requests to vary parenting transfer arrangements and for reimbursement of vehicle maintenance costs were dismissed.
