An application was brought seeking a recognizance to keep the peace against the respondent.
The respondent, having relocated to Alberta and lacking financial means to return, was not present at the hearing.
The court considered four key issues: whether the matter could proceed ex parte with the respondent's agent; whether the respondent was aware of the consequences of failing to enter into a recognizance; whether a law student could appear as agent given the potential for imprisonment exceeding six months; and whether the agent could enter into the recognizance on behalf of the respondent or whether the court could direct entry into the recognizance in another jurisdiction.
The court determined that the hearing could proceed ex parte with the agent present, that the respondent was adequately apprised of the consequences, that section 802.1 of the Criminal Code did not prohibit the agent's appearance in a section 810 proceeding, and that the respondent must personally enter into the recognizance, with any warrant of committal being executable only within Ontario.
