The appellant appealed a motions judge's order regarding child and spousal support.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, finding that the motions judge erred by proceeding with the hearing before the appellant had a meaningful opportunity to review the respondent's unsworn materials.
Furthermore, the motions judge's reasons failed to distinguish between child and spousal support, and the spousal support award was made without the respondent having filed a financial statement.
The matter was remitted to the Superior Court of Justice for a rehearing.
