The defendants, Wildwood by the Lake Leaseholders Association and three individual board members, moved for summary dismissal of two actions brought by the plaintiff, a former board member.
The plaintiff alleged defamation arising from an investigation into her alteration of a job description document and subsequent reprimand.
The court dismissed the summary judgment motions, finding substantial factual disputes and witness credibility issues that require a trial.
The judge emphasized that the case was not suitable for summary judgment, particularly given the need for credibility assessments and the potential for the defence of qualified privilege to be defeated by malice or by exceeding the scope of the privilege.
The court also reiterated the Court of Appeal's caution against granting partial summary judgment.