The appellants appealed a trial judgment regarding a forbearance agreement.
At the opening of the appeal, the appellants abandoned a motion alleging reasonable apprehension of bias by the trial judge.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that the trial judge's findings of fact on misrepresentation, parol evidence, and reasonable notice were supported by the evidence.
The court also rejected a new argument based on the forbearance agreement, as it contemplated future terms rather than past representations.
