The appellant appealed a decision denying his claim for compensation from the Motor Vehicle Dealers Compensation Fund regarding a 2014 Mercedes he allegedly purchased but never received.
The Board argued the appellant was not acting as a consumer and was likely complicit in a fraudulent scheme orchestrated by the dealership.
The Licence Appeal Tribunal found the appellant's evidence not credible, noting he continued making loan payments for years without receiving the vehicle and engaged in multiple other vehicle transactions for business purposes.
The Tribunal concluded the appellant was not acting as a consumer and dismissed the appeal.
