The appellant appealed a judgment finding that a 2006 Transfer/Deed and Direction did not have testamentary effect, and sought leave to appeal a costs order.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, noting the appellant acknowledged the documents did not comply with the requirements of a valid will under the Succession Law Reform Act and could not identify a legal basis for their validity.
Leave to appeal the costs order was denied as no reviewable error was identified in the application judge's exercise of discretion.
