The applicant sought judicial review of a decision by the Refugee Protection Division (RPD) rejecting her claim for refugee protection based on her practice of Falun Gong in China.
The RPD found the applicant's supporting documents to be likely fraudulent and her narrative of exiting China via a smuggler using her own passport to be implausible given airport security measures.
The Federal Court held the RPD's assessment of the evidence, including its comparison of summonses and treatment of the applicant's ability to exit the country, was reasonable.
The application for judicial review was dismissed.