The appellant appealed a decision of the Discipline Committee finding her guilty of professional misconduct and imposing a four-month suspension.
The misconduct involved the appellant's role as a designated manager in overseeing the ordering of veterinary drugs from a wholesaler through a veterinarian's account using a false name, contrary to regulations.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding no palpable and overriding error in the Committee's evidentiary rulings, its interpretation of the relevant regulations, or its assessment of the penalty.
