The applicant moved to amend the timetable and compel the respondent to provide a further and better affidavit of documents.
The respondent sought to dismiss the motion, arguing compliance and proportionality.
The court found the respondent's affidavit of documents did not comply with Rule 30.03 and Form 30A, particularly regarding particulars for Schedule A and detailed grounds for privilege in Schedule B. The applicant was also directed to review her Schedule B. The court ordered the respondent to serve a compliant affidavit and amended the litigation timetable.
Costs were awarded to the applicant on a partial indemnity basis.
