The appellant appealed from the dismissal of his application for damages arising from his exclusion from WeChat groups related to his occupation as a real estate agent.
He also sought a declaration that the WeChat groups belonged to the respondent Homelife.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that an application was not the appropriate proceeding for advancing a damages claim of this type, and that there was no proper evidentiary foundation for either an intentional interference with economic relations claim, a civil conspiracy claim, or the declaration sought.
