The appellant appealed his summary conviction and sentence for assault causing bodily harm.
He argued the trial judge misapprehended evidence regarding the severity of the victim's broken arm and the presence of a second assailant, rendering the verdict unreasonable.
He also appealed his six-month conditional sentence, arguing it was demonstrably unfit and failed to account for immigration consequences.
The Superior Court of Justice dismissed the appeal, finding no material misapprehension of evidence, that the verdict was well-supported, and that the trial judge had appropriately considered the immigration consequences by granting lengthy adjournments prior to sentencing.
