The appellants appealed a trial judgment finding that a contract existed between the two individuals, C. Brar and S. Brar.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding there was evidence to support the trial judge's conclusion.
The respondent cross-appealed regarding a fraudulent conveyance.
The Court of Appeal allowed the cross-appeal, declaring the transfer of assets from the numbered company to SKLF Doors to be a fraudulent conveyance, as agreed by counsel for S. Brar and the numbered company.
Costs of $7,500 were awarded to the respondent.
