The appellant appealed a decision of the Chief Building Official revoking a building permit for the construction of a two-family dwelling.
The court dismissed the appeal, finding it was barred by res judicata as the revocation order had been previously upheld.
On the merits, the court held that while the property had legal non-conforming use status, the appellant's proposed construction constituted an extraordinary intensification of use that required a zoning variation from the Committee of Adjustments, which falls outside the authority of the Chief Building Official.
