The applicant wife sought leave to appeal a costs order of $32,107.82 made against her following an unsuccessful motion for partition and sale of a family cottage.
The court reviewed the test for granting leave to appeal an interlocutory order under Rule 62.02(4) of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
The court found that the motions judge had correctly applied the proper principles in awarding costs and that the wife failed to demonstrate conflicting decisions or good reason to doubt the correctness of the order.
The motion for leave to appeal was dismissed.
