The accused was charged with sexual assault and threatening bodily harm against his wife.
The case turned entirely on credibility, as there was no independent corroborating evidence.
The complainant alleged the accused injured her clitoris and threatened her, while the accused denied the allegations.
Applying the W.(D.) framework, the court found no reason to reject the accused's evidence and concluded it raised a reasonable doubt.
The court also found the alleged threatening words were too vague to constitute a threat.
The accused was acquitted on both counts.
