The appellant appealed the dismissal of his claim against his financial institution, arguing the bank had a duty to determine whether funds in his account were exempt from garnishment before forwarding them to the Sheriff.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding no authority for such an obligation.
The court also found no palpable and overriding error in the trial judge's factual findings regarding the appellant's delay in taking action, and concluded there was no denial of the right to present evidence or cross-examine.
