Timothy W. Sargeant

The applicants sought to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party trade union.

A representation vote was held, and more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union.

As no party filed representations, the Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the intervenor employer.

In an application for certification, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the Notice of Vote and Hearing had not been posted appropriately by the employer.

Consequently, the Board ordered the postponement of the representation vote from April 7, 2000, to April 10, 2000, and directed the employer to post the decision immediately.

The applicant, a group of employees of Better Beef, sought to withdraw their application against the responding party, U.F.C.W. Local 617P.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicants, United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 527 and the Ontario Pipe Trades Council, sought to withdraw their application against Dordan Mechanical Contractors Ltd. The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

In an application for certification, the Ontario Labour Relations Board directed that the ballots cast in a representation vote be counted.

The ballot box had previously been sealed pending the resolution of a related file.

Following the issuance of a decision in that related matter, the Board ordered the Registrar to arrange for the counting of the ballots.

The applicant employee applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration terminating the responding party union's bargaining rights.

The union failed to file a response within the stipulated time.

Finding the application timely and that at least forty percent of the employees in the bargaining unit expressed a wish not to be represented by the union, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the application would be deemed terminated if neither party requested to proceed.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification.

The responding party failed to file a response within the stipulated time.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that not less than forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union at the time the application was made.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken of the eligible employees in the voting constituency.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The union applied for certification of a bargaining unit consisting of approximately 19 part-time employees working at the Acadian Court Restaurant within a Hudsons Bay Company store.

The employer argued the unit was inappropriate as it would carve out one department from at least 14 in the store, leading to undue fragmentation.

The Board found that the restaurant was functionally integrated with the rest of the store and that the employees shared similar working conditions and corporate policies with other store employees.

Applying its policy against departmental units to avoid serious labour relations problems, the Board held the proposed unit was not appropriate and dismissed the application.

The parties agreed to adjourn the applications sine die for a period not exceeding one year.

The Board consented to the adjournment, noting that the matters would be deemed terminated if neither party requested to proceed within that time.

The applicant hospital brought an application under the Public Sector Labour Relations Transition Act, 1997.

Following a representation vote where not more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the Canadian Union of Public Employees Local 4000, the Board ordered the termination of the union's bargaining rights for the specified bargaining unit of office and clerical employees.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union within the meaning of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Based on the information and membership evidence filed, the Board determined that not less than forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.

The Board ordered a representation vote to be taken of the eligible employees in the voting constituency.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union within the meaning of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that the proposed bargaining unit is appropriate.

Based on the membership evidence filed, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification.

The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support of at least forty percent in the proposed bargaining unit.

The Board directed a representation vote to be held on March 30, 2000.

Because the responding party disputed the geographic scope of the bargaining unit, the Board ordered that the ballots cast by employees in London, Tillsonburg, and Aylmer be segregated and not counted until further order or agreement.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where the union failed to secure more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast, and with no representations filed by either party, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application.

A mandatory one-year bar on subsequent certification applications by the union for the same bargaining unit was imposed.

The applicant sought to withdraw her application against Bell Canada and the Canadian Telephone Employees' Association.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.

The Board consented to the adjournment, noting that the matter would be deemed terminated if neither party requested to proceed within that time.

The applicant sought to withdraw the application against the responding party.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant sought to withdraw his application against the responding parties.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.