Timothy W. Sargeant

The applicant union consented to the dismissal of its certification application under section 10(2) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant.

The Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further certification applications by the applicant for the same bargaining unit.

The applicant union filed an application for certification.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that it appeared to have the requisite 40% membership support in the proposed bargaining unit.

The Board directed a representation vote.

The applicant requested an expedited vote prior to the normal five-day period, alleging fears of unlawful conduct by the responding party.

The Board declined to vary its normal practice and scheduled the vote for the fifth day after the application was filed.

The applicant union applied for certification for a bargaining unit of cleaning and maintenance employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant, Teamsters Local Union 91, sought to withdraw its application against the responding party, Palmar Inc. The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The intervenor union requested an order directing the responding party employer to produce documents relating to the negotiation and ratification of a collective agreement, as well as documents received by the employer's board of directors regarding the certification application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request, ordering the employer to produce the documents it was prepared to produce and to provide reasons for any documents withheld.

The parties agreed to adjourn the application sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.

The applicant applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

On the agreement of the parties, the Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.

If no party requests to proceed within that time, the application will be deemed terminated.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification.

The responding party employer failed to file a response within the stipulated time and requested an extension to seek legal representation, which the Board denied.

Finding that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where not more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application.

A one-year bar on further applications by the applicant for the same bargaining unit was imposed.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent maintenance and security employees of the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members.

The Board directed a representation vote.

The employer disagreed with the union's estimate of the number of individuals in the bargaining unit under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

However, the majority of the Board determined that regardless of the estimate used, the forty percent threshold was met, and declined to seal the ballot box.

A dissenting Board member would have ordered the ballot box sealed pursuant to section 8.1(4) of the Act.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for employees of the responding party.

A representation vote was held, and the union failed to obtain more than 50% of the ballots cast.

As no statement of desire to make representations was filed, the Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further certification applications by the union for this bargaining unit.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statement of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the certificate and cancelled previously set hearing dates.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for a unit of employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the union as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification.

The responding party asserted that the application was premature because the nursing home was still under construction and currently had no employees, as transfers from another facility had not yet occurred.

The Board directed the applicant to provide written submissions as to why the application should not be dismissed for prematurity.

The applicant union applied for certification.

A representation vote was held, and not more than 50% of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further certification applications by the applicant for this bargaining unit.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where not more than 50% of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application.

A one-year bar on subsequent applications for certification by the applicant was imposed.

The applicants sought to withdraw their application against the Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 1059 and Shawn Bailey.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant sought to withdraw his application against the responding party union.

The matter was resolved without a hearing on the merits.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a brief decision granting leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.