Timothy W. Sargeant

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of its predecessor trade union by reason of a merger, amalgamation, or transfer of jurisdiction.

The application was unopposed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the declaration.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of its predecessor trade union by reason of a merger, amalgamation, or transfer of jurisdiction.

The application was unopposed.

The Board granted the declaration, finding that the applicant had acquired the predecessor's rights, privileges, and duties.

The applicant sought to withdraw her application against the responding party union.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the applicant as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for the responding party's employees.

Following a representation vote where not more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application.

A mandatory one-year bar was imposed on the applicant from bringing another certification application for the same bargaining unit.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding parties.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of employees at the responding party's workplace.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the application and directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant and employees of Woollatt Building Supply brought an application to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

Following a representation vote directed by the Board, not more than fifty percent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in opposition to the union.

Consequently, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and ordered the destruction of the ballots after 30 days.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statement of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found the agreed-upon bargaining unit appropriate.

A certificate was ordered to issue to the applicant.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board found the applicant to be a trade union and determined the appropriate bargaining unit based on the parties' agreement.

Finding that at least 40% of the individuals in the proposed unit were union members, the Board directed a representation vote.

Although the employer gave notice under section 8.1 of the Act disagreeing with the union's estimate of individuals in the unit, the employer agreed to count the ballots, so the Board did not order the ballot box sealed.

Board Member Ronson dissented, arguing the vote should not take place or the ballot box should be sealed until the section 8.1 issues were resolved.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of Woolwich Lodge.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that it appeared to have the requisite 40 percent membership support in the proposed bargaining unit.

The Board directed that a representation vote be held, with segregated ballots for disputed office and clerical staff positions.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

A representation vote was held, and not more than 50% of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed within the time fixed under Rule 62 of the Board's Rules of Procedure.

Consequently, the Board dismissed the application for certification and imposed a one-year bar on further applications by the applicant for the same bargaining unit.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, based on the agreement of the parties.

If neither party requests to proceed within that time, the matter will be deemed terminated.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for the employees of the responding party.

A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast were in favour of the applicant.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed.

The Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further certification applications by the applicant for this bargaining unit.

The responding party union requested an extension of time to file a response.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the extension until October 23, 2000.

The applicant trade union applied for certification.

The responding party failed to file a response within the stipulated time.

Based on the application material and membership evidence, the Board found that not less than forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its applications before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Board granted leave and the applications were withdrawn.

The United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 175/663 requested a stay of a representation vote scheduled for October 13, 2000, claiming its rights may be affected by the application.

The Board declined to stay the vote but noted the ballot box had been ordered sealed.

The Board directed that a copy of the application and response be forwarded to the union's counsel and stated that any issues arising could be dealt with subsequently.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of its predecessor union by reason of a merger, amalgamation, or transfer of jurisdiction.

The application was unopposed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the application and issued the requested declaration.