Timothy W. Sargeant

The applicant sought to withdraw her application against the responding party union.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant withdrew her application against the responding party union with leave of the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The applicant union sought leave to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant trade union filed a displacement application for certification.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.

The Board ordered a representation vote to be held on December 5, 2000, for the part-time employees and students at the responding party's nursing home.

The applicant trade union filed a displacement application for certification to represent a bargaining unit of employees at Central Park Lodges in Thunder Bay.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union at the time the application was made.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees to determine whether they wish to be represented by the applicant or the intervenor union.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification.

The Board found the applicant to be a trade union and that it had filed sufficient membership evidence to warrant a representation vote.

The intervenor requested that the application be dismissed or the ballot box sealed due to alleged unfair practices and breaches of a court order and union constitution.

The Board dismissed the intervenor's requests, noting it had rejected similar submissions in previous decisions, and directed that a representation vote be held.

The applicant applied to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots cast by employees were in opposition to the union, the Ontario Labour Relations Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the intervenor employer.

The application was granted and previously set hearing dates were cancelled.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees at a hospital, currently represented by the intervenor union.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that it appeared to have the requisite 40% membership support.

The Board directed a representation vote.

The intervenor requested that the application be dismissed or the ballot box sealed due to alleged unfair practices and breaches of a court order and union constitution.

The Board dismissed these requests, noting it had rejected similar submissions in previous decisions, and ordered the vote to proceed.

The responding party requested an extension of time to file a response to the application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the extension until December 13, 2000.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of Fellowship Towers.

The Board found that the union met the 40% membership threshold required to order a representation vote.

The employer disagreed with the union's estimate of the number of individuals in the bargaining unit and requested that the ballot box be sealed under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The majority of the Board declined to seal the ballot box, finding that the 40% threshold was met regardless of which estimate was used.

A representation vote was ordered.

Board Member Rundle dissented, arguing that section 8.1(4) mandates sealing the ballot box when the employer gives notice of disagreement.

The applicant brought a duty of fair representation complaint against the responding union under section 74 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The applicant requested the production of employment records for himself and two other employees from the intervenor employer.

The employer opposed the request.

The Board found the requested material to be arguably relevant and directed the employer to produce the information.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for the responding party's employees.

Following a representation vote where not more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statement of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application.

The Board imposed a one-year bar on further certification applications by the applicant for this bargaining unit.

The applicants filed an application to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the intervenor employer.

The responding party sought reconsideration of a Board decision that refused to extend the time for filing a response to an application for certification.

The responding party argued that although the application was faxed on November 23, 2000, it did not come to the attention of an authorized representative until November 27, 2000.

The Board denied the request for reconsideration, noting that the application was duly served on November 23, 2000, and the request for reconsideration did not raise any compelling submissions that could not reasonably have been advanced earlier.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board found that the union had the requisite 40% membership support in the proposed bargaining unit and ordered a representation vote.

Although the employer filed a notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 disagreeing with the union's estimate of the number of individuals in the bargaining unit, the Board declined to seal the ballot box, finding that the union met the 40% threshold regardless of which estimate was used.

A dissenting Board member would have ordered the ballot box sealed pursuant to section 8.1(4) of the Act.

The applicant filed an application to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, and with no representations filed by the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees in the bargaining unit.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for the employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where the union failed to obtain more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application.

The Board imposed a mandatory one-year bar on any further certification applications by the applicant for the same bargaining unit.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least 40% of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members.

The Board directed a representation vote to be held on December 1, 2000.

The employer disagreed with the bargaining unit description and the union's estimate of the number of individuals, but agreed to have the ballots counted.