Stephen Raymond

The applicant union filed an application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

Following a representation vote, the Board found that not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were cast in opposition to the responding party.

As no statement of desire to make representations was filed, the Board dismissed the application and ordered the destruction of the ballots after 30 days.

The applicant trade union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the applicant as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union at the time the application was made.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken of the eligible employees in the voting constituency.

The applicant served the responding party outside the time limits required by the Board's earlier letter.

The Board relieved against the time limits and directed that the application be processed, referring the matter to the Registrar.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent a unit of office and clerical employees at Cambridge Memorial Hospital.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no outstanding issues between the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification to represent employees and active volunteers of the responding party ambulance service.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995 and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.

The Board ordered a representation vote to be held, with segregated ballots for disputed supervisory positions.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant sought to withdraw his application against the responding party union.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The majority of the Board found that the numerical difference between the parties was not significant and that the applicant had established sufficient membership support to obtain a representation vote.

The Board ordered a representation vote and directed that ballots of individuals in disputed positions be segregated.

One Board member dissented, arguing that section 8.1(4) required the ballot box to be sealed.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The responding party disputed the union's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The majority of the Board found that the numerical difference between the parties' estimates was not significant and that the union had established sufficient membership support for a representation vote.

The Board ordered a representation vote and directed that the ballots be counted.

A dissenting Board member would have ordered the ballot box sealed pursuant to section 8.1(4) of the Act.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members.

The Board directed a representation vote for the employees of the responding party at the Ontario Police College, with disputed ballots from students to be segregated.

The applicant union applied for certification.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board cancelled a previously scheduled representation vote.

Based on the agreement of the parties, the Board directed that a new representation vote be taken for the agreed-upon voting constituency of employees at the Apple Hill Quarry.

The Board provided directions for the vote, posting of notices, and the filing of representations regarding any remaining disputes.

The applicant requested that the matter be heard expeditiously.

The Board directed that a copy of the applicant's letter and particulars be sent to the responding party, and referred the issue of an expeditious hearing to the Registrar.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of registered and graduate practical nurses employed by the Victorian Order of Nurses Durham Branch.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a final decision without a hearing.

The Board found the agreed-upon bargaining unit appropriate and directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union requested a one-year extension of its trusteeship over Local 1883 pursuant to section 89(2) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board directed the applicant to notify the affected members of the request and provided the members until June 30, 2000, to submit any opposition in writing.

The Board granted an interim extension of the trusteeship until July 31, 2000, pending receipt of submissions.

The applicant, Jean Jordan, sought to withdraw her application against the Ontario Nurses' Association.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant filed an application against the responding party union, with the employer participating as an intervenor.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the applicant leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant trade union brought to the Board's attention an earlier decision confirming its status.

The Board issued this decision to confirm that the applicant is a trade union within the meaning of section 1(1) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members.

Despite a dispute over the bargaining unit description and the inclusion of students, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken, with disputed ballots to be segregated.

The applicant filed an application but failed to serve it on the responding party trade union and the employer as directed by the Board.

The Board ordered the applicant to serve the other parties and file proof of service by June 23, 2000, failing which the application would be dismissed.