Raymond C. Ramdayal

The appellant appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend his commercial driver's licence for medical reasons following a seizure and intercranial hemorrhage.

The appellant argued that he had no history of seizures and that a five-year seizure-free requirement was excessive.

The Tribunal found that the appellant's medical condition, including the risk of future seizures and the high dose of antiseizure medication, was likely to significantly interfere with his ability to drive a commercial motor vehicle safely.

The Registrar's decision to downgrade the licence was confirmed.

The appellant appealed the 45-day impoundment of her vehicle under the Highway Traffic Act on the grounds of exceptional hardship.

The vehicle was impounded after the appellant loaned it to her brother-in-law, who was caught driving with a suspended licence.

The Tribunal found that the appellant did not meet the first requirement for exceptional hardship under O. Reg. 631/98, as she had alternatives to the impounded vehicle, such as public transit and ride-sharing services.

The appeal was dismissed and the impoundment order was confirmed.

The appellant appealed the Registrar's Notice of Proposal to refuse his registration as a motor vehicle salesperson under the Motor Vehicle Dealers Act, 2002.

The parties reached an agreement and requested a consent order imposing conditions on the appellant's registration, including compliance with the Code of Ethics, disclosure of future charges or convictions, and restrictions on his role at any dealership for two years.

The Tribunal found it had jurisdiction under section 4.1 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act to issue the consent order without a hearing and ordered that the consent order be carried out.

The appellant homeowner appealed a decision by Tarion Warranty Corporation denying warranty coverage for several alleged defects in his new home, including water puddling, grading issues, and interior defects.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that the items either fell outside the scope of the second-year warranty or were deemed withdrawn because the appellant failed to request a conciliation inspection within the strict statutory timelines prescribed by Regulation 892.

The appellant appealed the Minister of Transportation's decision to downgrade his commercial driver's licence to a Class G licence due to his cardiovascular conditions.

The Minister relied on the National Medical Standards, noting the appellant's history of congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and aortic stenosis.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the appellant's multiple heart conditions, including a left ventricle ejection fraction below 35% and a declined implantable cardioverter defibrillator, posed a high risk of sudden incapacitation.

The Tribunal concluded that these conditions were likely to significantly interfere with his ability to safely operate a commercial vehicle and confirmed the Minister's decision.

The appellant appealed the medical suspension of his driver's licence, which was suspended following a report of alcohol dependence.

During the hearing, the respondent confirmed that the medical suspension had been cancelled.

The appellant confirmed he no longer wished to proceed, and the matter was settled.

The appellant appealed a Notice of Proposal by the Registrar to refuse his registration as a motor vehicle salesperson.

The Registrar's refusal was based on the appellant's extensive criminal record, which included violent offences and breaches of conditions, as well as his failure to provide requested information regarding his immigration status and community supervision.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the appellant's past conduct afforded reasonable grounds to believe he would not carry on business with honesty and integrity.

The Tribunal directed the Registrar to carry out the proposal to refuse the registration.