P. Tomlin

The appellant appealed the City of Cambridge's Zoning By-law No. 25-014 to permit two industrial warehouse buildings.

The parties reached a settlement.

Based on uncontroverted expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment had appropriate regard for provincial interests, was consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement, conformed to official plans, and represented good planning.

The appeal was allowed in part to amend the by-law in accordance with the settlement.

The applicant appealed the Town of The Blue Mountains' Zoning By-law No. 2018-65 under section 34(19) of the Planning Act to facilitate a 19-unit residential development.

The parties reached a full settlement on consent.

Based on the uncontested expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the proposed development represents good planning, is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement, and conforms to the applicable official plans.

The appeal was allowed in part, and the zoning by-law was amended to implement the settlement.

The applicant appealed the City of Mississauga committee of adjustment's decision regarding a consent to sever a property to develop a new detached dwelling.

The parties reached a full settlement.

Based on uncontested planning evidence, the Tribunal found that the revised conditions, which include dedicating a Natural Heritage Feature to the City and establishing a 3.0-metre buffer, represent good planning and are consistent with provincial policies.

The appeal was allowed in part and provisional consent was granted subject to the revised conditions.