Applicant directed to provide written submissions clarifying which Order to Pay is being appealed and addressing timeliness.
The applicant brought an application under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act to challenge an Order to Pay.
The Board noted ambiguity regarding whether the applicant was appealing a 1999 Order, a 2001 Order, or both, which affected the timeliness analysis.
The Board directed the applicant to provide written representations clarifying the precise nature of the appeal and addressing the timeliness issues.
Whitman Engineering Limited v. Cheryle Baker, Brian Thwaites, Ryan Hay and Ministry of Labour, 2001 CanLII 6562