Jeffery Campbell

The Registrar issued a Notice of Proposal to revoke the appellant's registration as a travel retailer under the Travel Industry Act, 2002, citing a working capital deficiency.

The parties resolved the issues and consented to the continued registration of the appellant subject to conditions, including maintaining minimum working capital and timely filing of financial statements.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal disposed of the proceeding without a hearing and ordered the continued registration on the agreed conditions.

The appellant appealed a Notice of Proposal to refuse his registration as a motor vehicle salesperson under the Motor Vehicle Dealers Act, 2002.

The parties reached a resolution and consented to the appellant's registration subject to specific terms and conditions, including compliance with the Act and disclosure of criminal records.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal disposed of the proceeding without a hearing and issued a consent order incorporating the agreed terms.

The applicant sought non-earner benefits and funding for two chiropractic treatment plans following a motor vehicle accident.

The respondent denied the benefits based on insurer examinations which concluded the applicant's impairments were pre-existing and did not result in a complete inability to carry on a normal life.

The Tribunal preferred the respondent's multidisciplinary assessment over the applicant's late-filed psychological report, finding the latter lacked contemporaneous relevance and adequate documentary review.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, concluding the applicant failed to prove entitlement to the non-earner benefit or the disputed treatment plans.

The appellant appealed a Notice of Proposal to refuse his registration as a real estate salesperson under the Real Estate and Business Brokers Act, 2002.

The parties reached a settlement and requested the Tribunal dispose of the proceeding without a hearing.

The Tribunal issued a consent order incorporating the Minutes of Settlement, which required the appellant to withdraw his application, complete specific educational and rehabilitation programs, and permitted him to reapply upon successful completion.

The appellants appealed a Notice of Proposal by the Registrar to refuse their registrations as a motor vehicle salesperson and a motor vehicle dealer under the Motor Vehicle Dealers Act, 2002.

The Registrar argued that neither the individual nor the corporate appellant could reasonably be expected to be financially responsible in the conduct of business.

The Tribunal found that the appellants failed to provide sufficient evidence of financial viability, presented unrealistic business plans, and failed to resolve or adequately explain a $35,324 CRA tax lien against the corporation.

The Tribunal directed the Registrar to carry out the proposal to refuse the registrations.

The appellant rental car company appealed the impoundment of its vehicle under section 55.1 of the Highway Traffic Act.

The vehicle was impounded after being driven by an individual with a suspended licence.

The appellant argued the impoundment caused financial loss.

The Tribunal found that the appellant had 143 other vehicles in its fleet, meaning there were reasonable alternatives to the impounded vehicle.

Furthermore, the impoundment would not result in an immediate, significant, and lasting financial loss.

The appeal was dismissed and the impoundment confirmed.

The appellant appealed the 45-day impoundment of his vehicle under the Highway Traffic Act.

The vehicle was impounded after being driven by an individual with a suspended licence.

The appellant, a member of the Canadian Armed Forces living on a military base, argued that the impoundment caused exceptional hardship because he had no reasonable alternative transportation to work and was subject to 24/7 recall duty.

The Tribunal found that the appellant had no reasonable alternative to the vehicle and faced immediate, significant, and long-lasting financial and economic losses, including potential termination of employment.

The appeal was allowed and the vehicle was ordered released.

The appellants appealed a Notice of Proposal issued by the Registrar under the Motor Vehicle Dealers Act, 2002, which proposed to revoke the registrations of a motor vehicle dealer and a salesperson, and refuse the registration of another salesperson.

The parties resolved the issues in dispute and consented to an order continuing the registrations subject to extensive terms and conditions.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal disposed of the proceeding without a hearing pursuant to section 4.1 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, incorporating the agreed-upon terms and conditions into the consent order.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following two motor vehicle accidents.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's injuries, including soft tissue injuries and right knee pain, fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG) and that she did not have a pre-existing condition warranting removal.

As the applicant had exhausted the $3,500 MIG limit, she was not entitled to the disputed physiotherapy treatment plans.

The Tribunal also dismissed the claim for non-earner benefits, finding the applicant failed to prove a complete inability to carry on a normal life.

The appellant appealed the 45-day impoundment of her vehicle after it was driven by an acquaintance whose licence was suspended.

The Tribunal found that the vehicle was not stolen, as the appellant had consented to the driver using it.

The Tribunal also found that the appellant failed to exercise due diligence, as she only took a cursory glance at a card presented by the driver without verifying it was a valid licence.

Finally, the Tribunal concluded that the impoundment did not cause exceptional hardship, as the appellant had access to reasonable transportation alternatives.

The appellants appealed a Notice of Proposal by the Registrar to revoke their registrations as motor vehicle salespersons and disentitle the corporate appellant to registration as a motor vehicle dealer.

The parties resolved the issues and consented to an order continuing the registrations subject to strict terms and conditions, including periodic inspections, completion of certification courses, and restrictions on involvement in certain dealerships.

The Tribunal disposed of the proceeding without a hearing pursuant to section 4.1 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act.

The appellant appealed a Notice of Proposal to revoke its registration as a travel retailer under the Travel Industry Act, 2002.

The parties resolved the issues in dispute and consented to the continued registration of the appellant subject to specific conditions, including the timely filing of financial statements.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal disposed of the proceeding without a hearing and issued a consent order incorporating the agreed-upon terms.

The appellant appealed the 45-day impoundment of his leased vehicle under the Highway Traffic Act.

The vehicle was impounded after the appellant's son was caught driving it with a suspended licence.

The appellant argued that the impoundment caused exceptional hardship due to his medical issues and rural location.

The Tribunal found that the appellant had reasonable alternatives to the impounded vehicle, including family assistance, ride-sharing, taxis, and rental vehicles.

The appeal was dismissed and the impoundment was confirmed.

The Appellant appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend her driver's licence for medical reasons under s. 47(1) of the Highway Traffic Act.

The suspension was based on a Medical Condition Report from her neurologist diagnosing her with mild cognitive impairment and her subsequent failure to complete a required functional driving assessment.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the medical evidence from the Appellant's treating physicians outweighed the anecdotal evidence from her family members.

The Tribunal concluded that the Appellant's cognitive impairment is likely to significantly interfere with her ability to drive safely and confirmed the Registrar's decision to suspend her licence.

The appellant sought to appeal the 180-day impoundment of its rental vehicle after it was driven by an individual with an interlock ignition device condition.

The appellant brought motions to reduce the length of the impoundment and to extend the time for filing the appeal.

The Tribunal dismissed the motion to reduce the impoundment, finding it lacked statutory authority to modify the Registrar's decision.

The Tribunal also denied the motion to extend the time to appeal, finding no bona fide intention to appeal within the 15-day period, significant unexplained delay, prejudice to the Registrar, and a low likelihood of success on the merits regarding due diligence.

The appellant appealed a Notice of Proposal to revoke his registration as a motor vehicle dealer under the Motor Vehicle Dealers Act, 2002.

The parties resolved the issues and consented to the continued registration of the appellant subject to specific terms and conditions.

Pursuant to section 4.1 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, the Licence Appeal Tribunal disposed of the proceeding without a hearing and ordered the registration continued on the agreed terms.

The Registrar issued a Notice of Proposal to revoke the appellant's registration as a travel retailer under the Travel Industry Act, 2002, citing past conduct and financial position.

The appellant appealed the proposal to the Licence Appeal Tribunal.

The parties subsequently resolved the issues and consented to the continued registration of the appellant subject to specific conditions, including timely filing of financial statements and forms.

The Tribunal disposed of the proceeding without a hearing and issued a consent order incorporating the agreed-upon conditions.

The appellant appealed a Notice of Proposal to revoke its registration as a travel retailer under the Travel Industry Act, 2002.

The parties resolved the issues and consented to the continued registration of the appellant subject to specific conditions, including timely filing of financial statements and Form 1, and responding to requests for information.

The Tribunal disposed of the proceeding without a hearing pursuant to section 4.1 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, ordering the continued registration on the agreed terms.

The appellant appealed the Minister of Transportation's decision to change his commercial driver's licence from class AMZ to GMZ due to a suspected medical condition of syncope or loss of consciousness.

The appellant experienced an episode of weakness, which he attributed to severe financial stress, fatigue, and lack of nutrition, rather than a medical condition.

Medical evidence, including normal diagnostic tests and clearance from an internist, supported the appellant's explanation.

The Tribunal found that the appellant did not suffer from the alleged medical condition and set aside the Minister's decision.

The applicant sought income replacement benefits and medical benefits following two motor vehicle accidents.

The insurer denied the benefits and required the applicant to attend insurer examinations.

The Tribunal found that the insurer's notices of examination were insufficient because they failed to provide specific medical reasons related to the applicant's condition.

The Tribunal held that the applicant's attendance at the examinations did not waive his right to challenge the notices, nor did the subsequent examination reports cure the defective notices.

As a result, the insurer was ordered to pay the income replacement benefits and the disputed treatment plans, plus interest.