Jack Young is a vice-chair at the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal with 118 decisions on record from 2000 to 2013. Key areas include administrative law, other tribunals, environmental law.

What tribunal does Jack Young sit on?

Jack Young sits on the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal.

What areas of law does Jack Young decide?

Jack Young's most common areas include Administrative Law (112 decisions), Other Tribunals (105 decisions), Environmental Law (50 decisions). Jack Young has handled 118 decisions across 4 areas.

How many decisions has Jack Young made?

Jack Young has 118 decisions on record from 2000 to 2013.

Who frequently appears before Jack Young?

Representatives who frequently appear before Jack Young include Keith Armstrong, Joanne Cook, Belfa Thomas.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Jack Young — Vice-Chair

Jack Young

Vice-Chair·Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal·Since 2000

118

cases · 14 yrs · OAFRAAT

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice Chair· 79Vice-Chair· 31Vice Chair· 2Vice Chair· 2Vice chair· 1vice-président· 1Vice-Chair· 1Vice-Chairman· 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 9, 2001

Appeal of municipal drain assessment dismissed; engineer's cost apportionment found fair and reasonable.

The appellant appealed the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the engineer's report on the Davis Drain, arguing that his property would not benefit from the proposed drainage works and his assessment was unfair.

The engineer testified that the upgrades were necessary to resolve flooding in a subdivision and explained the methodology for apportioning costs between agricultural and residential properties.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that the engineer's division of costs and calculation of assessments were fair, reasonable, and consistently applied.

Davis Drain (Re), 2001 ONAFRAAT 25

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 9, 2001

Tribunal approved uncontested amendments to a drainage works by-law to incorporate fish habitat enhancements.

The applicant consulting engineers requested a modification to a municipal by-law concerning drainage works to incorporate a reduction in land allowances and the addition of aquatic habitat enhancements required by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.

The affected landowner consented to the reduction, and the municipality supported the changes.

The Tribunal approved the requested amendments under section 51(1) of the Drainage Act, directing the engineer to amend the report and the municipality to amend the by-law accordingly.

Todgham and Case Associates Incorporated v. Municipality of Chatham-Kent, 2001 ONAFRAAT 2

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 2, 2001

Tribunal ordered deletion of upper portion of municipal drain branch due to lack of valid petition.

Multiple landowners appealed the revised Final Engineer's Report on the Allanport Road Municipal Drain under sections 48 and 54 of the Drainage Act.

At the hearing, a preliminary motion was brought regarding the validity of the petition for the upstream portion of Branch No. 8.

The Tribunal found that no petition meeting the requirements of the Drainage Act was filed within the time prescribed by its previous interim order.

Consequently, the Tribunal ordered the deletion of the upper portion of Branch No. 8 from the proposed work and directed the engineer to prepare a document recommending changes to the report and assessment schedules.

Carole Robinson et al. v. City of Thorold, 2001 ONAFRAAT 20

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMar 27, 2001

Appeal regarding municipal drain construction allowed in part to remediate improper spoil disposal.

The appellant appealed the quality of construction of a municipal drain under section 64 of the Drainage Act.

The appellant raised concerns regarding a gabion structure placed on its property, potential liability, and the improper disposal of excavated spoil which created a berm and caused ponding.

The Tribunal found the gabion structure was constructed adequately and in accordance with the engineer's report, and declined to order fencing at the drain's expense.

However, the Tribunal found the spoil was not adequately spread and ordered the engineer to consult with the landowner to level the material and construct swales to prevent ponding.

Woodville Drain #1 (Re), 2001 ONAFRAAT 19

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMar 23, 2001

Tribunal denies discovery of municipal engineer but orders limited document production and grants adjournment.

The appellant brought a preliminary motion seeking an adjournment, an examination for discovery of the municipal engineer, and the right for their own engineer to inspect the land.

The Tribunal denied the request for an examination for discovery, noting such orders are only for extraordinary circumstances.

However, the Tribunal granted the adjournment and ordered the municipal engineer to produce specific documents, including field notes and calculations, to ensure fairness without overcomplicating the quasi-judicial process.

Carl King v. City of Kawartha Lakes, 2001 ONAFRAAT 18

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalFeb 19, 2001

Drainage assessment appeal granted; original engineer's report reinstated after Court of Revision's inequitable alterations.

The appellants appealed their assessment under the Drainage Act regarding the Dippel Drainage Works.

The Court of Revision had previously altered the engineer's original assessment schedule by shifting statutory benefits for culverts from downstream landowners to the appellants.

The Tribunal found no basis in the Drainage Act for the Court of Revision's changes and noted that the revised maintenance schedule inequitably burdened the appellants.

The Tribunal granted the appeal, set aside the Court of Revision's decision, and reinstated the original engineer's report.

Orland and Freida Dippel v. Township of West Grey, 2001 ONAFRAAT 9

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalFeb 16, 2001

Drainage assessment adjusted to reflect increased costs driven by upstream urbanization rather than agricultural benefit.

The appellant appealed the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the engineer's report on the reconstruction of a municipal drain.

The appellant argued that the drainage problems were caused by urban encroachment and that her agricultural property was unfairly assessed for the costs of upgrading the drain to accommodate residential runoff.

The Tribunal found that the statutory benefit assessment on the appellant's lands should be reduced, as the report was driven by the need of upstream lands and increased urbanization.

The Tribunal ordered adjustments to the assessment schedule, reducing the appellant's benefit assessment and increasing the outlet liability for non-agricultural and upstream properties.

Suzanne Burlatschenko v. Township of Norfolk, 2001 ONAFRAAT 8

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJan 31, 2001

Appeals regarding municipal drain construction and outlet location dismissed; assessments adjusted.

Three landowners appealed the engineer's report and the Court of Revision's decision regarding the proposed Cook-Leddy Municipal Drain.

The appellants raised concerns about the necessity of the drain, the location of the outlet, potential pollution of a farm pond, and the apportionment of assessments.

The Tribunal found that the drain was necessary to address excess water and provide a legal outlet.

It declined to relocate the outlet downstream of the pond due to the substantial additional costs that would result.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals regarding the drain's construction and outlet location, but set aside the Court of Revision's decision and adjusted the assessments for two of the properties.

Cook-Leddy Municipal Drain (Re), 2001 ONAFRAAT 6

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJan 30, 2001

Application to procure engineer's report for drainage system assessment variation granted on consent.

The applicant municipality applied under section 76(1) of the Drainage Act for permission to procure an engineer's report to vary the assessment schedule for the Holland Marsh Drainage System.

During the hearing, the parties agreed to Minutes of Settlement.

The Tribunal granted the application and issued an order incorporating the settlement terms.

The order included cost-sharing provisions for the report and established procedures for a subsequent application to the Referee regarding legal liability issues.

Holland Marsh Drainage System (Re), 2001 ONAFRAAT 5

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 15, 2000

Tribunal adjusts municipal drain assessments to account for different run-off rates but declines to modify works.

Several landowners appealed the assessments and the engineer's report regarding the Bourdeau Municipal Drain.

The appellants argued that the municipality should bear the costs of drain modifications and repairs, and disputed their individual assessments based on the extent to which their properties contributed to or benefited from the drain.

The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to modify the drainage works but ordered adjustments to the assessment schedule, including a minimum assessment per property and specific reductions for certain landowners, noting that the engineer failed to differentiate run-off rates between residential and undeveloped lands.

Bourdeau Municipal Drain (Re), 2000 ONAFRAAT 31

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 16, 2000

Drainage works approved but benefit assessments varied to remove unjustified special levy on nearby properties.

Property owners appealed an engineer's report and a Court of Revision decision concerning improvements to a municipal drain.

The municipality initiated the report to enclose a fragile section of the open drain and update assessment schedules.

Appellants challenged the necessity of the works and the engineer's apportionment of costs, specifically a $200 special benefit assessment levied on 38 nearby properties.

The Tribunal approved the proposed works, finding them necessary to prevent potential collapse and flooding.

However, the Tribunal found the $200 special levy unjustified, ordering its deletion and reallocating the costs by increasing the assessments on the four properties immediately abutting the works and adding a nominal levy to all parcels in the watershed.

Oil Mill Creek Municipal Drain (Re), 2000 ONAFRAAT 30

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 8, 2000

Appeal of engineer's report under the Drainage Act dismissed; proposed drainage works and assessments upheld.

The appellants appealed an engineer's report under the Drainage Act regarding the Ripley Drain.

They had initially requested that an open ditch on their property be filled in with lawn tile, but objected to the $20,000 special benefit assessment and the routing of additional surface water across their property.

They requested that the surface water be diverted or the ditch relocated to the road allowance.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that the engineer's report appropriately addressed the drainage problems of upstream owners and that the appellants must bear the cost if they choose to enclose the ditch on their property.

Robert F. Hatch and Marianne Hatch v. Municipality of West Elgin, 2000 ONAFRAAT 29

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 8, 2000

Appeal regarding quality of construction of municipal drain dismissed; work found to be adequate.

The appellant appealed under section 64 of the Drainage Act regarding the quality of construction of improvements made to the McLellan Drain.

The appellant raised concerns about work done on his property without permission, damage to a private tile outlet, and erosion on the main branch.

The Tribunal found that the work was substantially completed as described in the engineer's report and was of adequate quality.

The appeal was dismissed, with the Tribunal clarifying that a portion of the drain on the appellant's property was part of the municipal drain.

McLellan Drain (Re), 2000 ONAFRAAT 28

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 16, 2000

Drainage appeal dismissed regarding necessity of works, but assessment varied to impose special benefit on downstream property.

The appellants appealed the engineer's report and the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the repair and improvement of the Outlet North Marsh Drain.

They argued that the proposed extension of the drain and erosion control work downstream of Victoria Road was solely for the benefit of a specific property and was necessitated by back-flow from the Thames River, not the drain itself.

The Tribunal accepted the engineering evidence that the erosion was not caused by the Thames River back-flow and that the extension was necessary for a sufficient outlet.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the report but allowed the assessment appeal in part, ordering a special benefit assessment of $30,000 against the downstream property most at risk from the erosion.

Outlet of the North Marsh Drain (Re), 2000 ONAFRAAT 27

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 12, 2000

Drainage report referred back to engineer for reconsideration of assessments and extent of work.

The appellants appealed the decision of the Court of Revision and the engineer's report regarding the Cook's Municipal Drain under the Drainage Act.

The Tribunal found that the engineer's report did not adequately address the drainage needs of all affected properties and that the apportionment of statutory benefit and outlet liability assessments required reconsideration.

The Tribunal ordered the report to be referred back to the engineer for further consideration and revision.

In a subsequent reconsideration decision, the Tribunal amended the deadlines for the municipality to consider the revised report due to upcoming municipal elections.

Costs of $250 were awarded against two appellants who failed to appear or abandon their appeal.

Cooks Drain (Re), 2000 ONAFRAAT 26

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalAug 3, 2000

Appeal granted; dairy board directed to provide a 3% increase in the transport rate labour component.

The appellant association of milk transporters appealed a decision by the respondent dairy board granting a 2% increase in the labour component of the Transport Rate Formula for 2000, seeking a 3% increase instead.

The appellant argued that milk truck drivers perform specialized duties as bulk tank milk graders and that a 3% increase was necessary to remain competitive with industry-wide wage growth.

The respondent contended that the 2% increase was equitable as it matched the increase given to its own staff.

The Tribunal granted the appeal, finding that current market factors and industry wage settlements supported a 3% increase.

Ontario Milk Transport Association v Dairy Farmers of Ontario, 2000 ONAFRAAT 16

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 9, 2000

Tribunal approved uncontested amendments to drainage by-law to reduce land allowance and add fish habitat.

The applicant consulting engineers requested a modification to a municipal by-law concerning the Malott Diversion Drain to reduce a land allowance and incorporate aquatic habitat enhancements required by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.

The affected landowner consented to the reduction and the municipality supported the changes.

The Tribunal approved the requested amendments under section 51(1) of the Drainage Act, finding that adequate notice had been given and no affected parties objected.

Todgham and Case Associates Incorporated v. Municipality of Chatham-Kent, 2000 ONAFRAAT 9

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJan 21, 2000

Drainage assessment report referred back to engineer for reconsideration due to errors and boundary issues.

The appellants appealed the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the assessments for the repair of the Edgar Sideroad Drain.

The engineer had based the assessments on a 1979 report but later provided a revised schedule that changed almost every property's assessment.

The appellants and other assessed owners raised concerns about the calculation of cut-off benefits, watershed boundaries, and the distribution of costs.

The engineer acknowledged errors and requested the report be referred back.

The Tribunal ordered the report referred back to the engineer for reconsideration under section 51(1) of the Drainage Act, with specific recommendations for the revised report, and ordered that the engineering costs for the revision and hearing not be charged to the drainage project.

Joseph Malenfant and Stanley Hall v. Town of Essex (Edgar Sideroad Drain), 2000 ONAFRAAT 2

Page 6 of 6 (118 cases)

agent for appellant Jennifer Noss

Wanda NicowskiAgent
1 appearance

agent for Lois Hayter

Glenn HayterAgent
1 appearance

agent for Margaret Mitchell, assessed landowner

Allan ButtonAgent
1 appearance

an assessed owner

Al McGregorSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald SkipperSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant

Keith ArmstrongSelf-represented
2 appearances
Joanne CookSelf-represented
2 appearances
Belfa ThomasSelf-represented
2 appearances
Bonnie McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brent RutledgeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Carolyn BoyceSelf-represented
1 appearance
David BoyceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald Dewayne HutchisonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Elaine MellingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ethel BarkerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Glen GearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Grant BurksSelf-represented
1 appearance
Heinz ProbstSelf-represented
1 appearance
Helen GrattoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Helmut FunkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Helmut RempelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Herb BathoSelf-represented
1 appearance
James DeanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jennifer NossSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim HoggSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant

Norm WalkerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Herbert GallawaySelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant and assessed landowner

Andrea ClemencioSelf-represented
1 appearance
Louis VargaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jackie OrgarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dave OrgarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Clifford TattersallSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant and landowner

Sylvain GauthierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Misty GauthierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald WaglerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Garry BeachSelf-represented
1 appearance
Harry BarclaySelf-represented
1 appearance
Lois LockhartSelf-represented
1 appearance
Maja MielonenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marjorie BeachSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant and representative of Lorne Ireland, appellant

Glenn IrelandSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant, JEMA Foods

Jim DiMennaAgent
1 appearance

Appellants

Fatima MarganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Trifu MarganSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner

Ken HamblySelf-represented
2 appearances
Daryl LoucksSelf-represented
2 appearances
Evelyn HamblySelf-represented
2 appearances
Gerry BakerSelf-represented
2 appearances
Gary LoveSelf-represented
1 appearance
G. DeWitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerry DewitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Grant LoveSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hank GorisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hugh WalkerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jackie ConnellySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jack WilkinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jacqueline ConnellySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jan Van NulandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jerry BakerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim LoveSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joe GroszeiblSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joe Isley Jr.Self-represented
1 appearance
Joe MurphySelf-represented
1 appearance

Assessed Landowner

John KuiperSelf-represented
1 appearance
John Kuiper Jr.Self-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, 14 Charles St.

Gerry BakerSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, 19 Charles St.

Carl GillespieSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, 26 Charles St.

Gerry DeWittSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, appellant

Meredith FirthSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul BrownSelf-represented
1 appearance
William O’HalloranSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner in the Elliott Drain watershed

Barbara BalogSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowners

Barry HarwoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Claude BourqueSelf-represented
1 appearance
David LaurenceSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, witness

Jack BerkhoutAgent
1 appearance

assessed owner

Bruce SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margaret BalgaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steve ChapoSelf-represented
1 appearance

assisting the appellant

Marielle KlijnAgent
1 appearance

au nom de l’intimée, la municipalité

André DesjardinsAgent
1 appearance
Neil LevacAgent
1 appearance

Ausauble Bayfield Conservation Authority

Ryan HernAgent
1 appearance

Clerk of the Municipality

Brenda BruntAgent
1 appearance

Counsel for the Appellant, Regional Municipality of Waterloo

Richard BrookesCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Municipality

Scott McEachranCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for the respondent, the City of Kawartha Lakes

Rosalie EvansCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the respondent the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

Ronald RobertsonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Township

Paul CoureyCounsel
2 appearances

counsel to appellant

Noël BerthiaumeCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to appellants Leo Harju and John Grimo

Peter LingardCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to JEMA Foods

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Leo Harju, appellant and John Grimo, appellant Helen Gratto, appellant

Peter LingardCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Mr. Leddy

Mike MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Nexfor Inc., appellant

John CrossinghamCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant

John LangloisCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, Donald Bailey

George ReynoldsCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellants

Delbert O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the engineer

Andrew OsyanyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Municipality of Bluewater

Andrew WrightCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Municipality of Leamington

Brian SweetCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Municipality of Thames Centre

David BroadCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, the City of St. Catharines

Lisa ValentiniCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Township of Laurentian Valley

Roy ReicheCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Township of Perth South

Gerry CullitonCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Tribunal

Michelle Douglas-CummingsIndependent Legal Counsel
1 appearance

Deputy Director of Public Works

Nick AragonaAgent
1 appearance

Deputy Reeve, Township of Brethour

Tom GoddardAgent
1 appearance

downstream landowner

Catherine KwarciakSelf-represented
1 appearance

drainage engineer on behalf of the Ministry of Transportation

John Van VorstAgent
1 appearance

drainage engineer who prepared report

E. Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance
Mike DeVosAgent
1 appearance

drainage engineer who prepared the engineer's report

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent

Henri BennemeerAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for Bradford West Gwillimbury and Township of King

Art JanseAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for Municipality

Robert SheachAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for the Municipality

Don LewisAgent
1 appearance
Harold HallAgent
1 appearance

drainage superintendent for the Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich, respondent

Ralph BeharrellAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent, for the Municipality of Thames Centre

Dennis ShandAgent
1 appearance

drainage superintendent for the Township of Southwold, assessed landowner

Brent ClutterbuckAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent on behalf of the Municipality

Wray RamseyAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent, Town of Minto

Chris PeterAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent, Township of West Lincoln

Harold KellyAgent
1 appearance

Engineer

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

engineer for the report

Bryon WiebeAgent
1 appearance
John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Kent SchachowskojAgent
1 appearance

Engineer for the Report

Bill DietrichAgent
1 appearance

Engineer, K. Smart Associates Limited

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

Engineer on behalf of the Municipality

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

Engineer, on behalf of the Municipality

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

Engineer responsible for the Report

John StidwillAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared report

Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the addendum to the report

Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the report

Gerard RoodAgent
1 appearance
Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance
Kent SchachowskojAgent
1 appearance
Mike DeVosAgent
1 appearance
Neil LevacAgent
1 appearance
Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the Report

Jeff DicksonAgent
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance

Engineer who prepared the report

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Neil LevacAgent
1 appearance
Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

Engineer who prepared the Report

John KuntzeAgent
2 appearances
Gaetan H. LascellesAgent
1 appearance
Neal MorrisAgent
1 appearance
Thomas PridhamAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the Report, for the Municipality of Leamington

Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance

for all of the appellants

Timothy FlanneryCounsel
1 appearance

for Ausable Bayfield Conservation Authority

Alec ScottAgent
1 appearance

for Barlow Square Inc.

Mike DejeanAgent
1 appearance

for CFO

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
Janet CioruchAgent
1 appearance

for Christ Church Huntingford

Robert WaltonAgent
1 appearance

for David Ashie and Patricia Ashie, affected landowners

Graham LordCounsel
1 appearance

for Dorian and Elizabeth Milleman

Elizabeth MillemanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Fernand Gauthier

Garnet McDiarmidAgent
1 appearance

for Garry Beach

Marjorie BeachSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Geoff Bradley, Christine Bradley, Marjorie Tiemersma and Louise Tiemersma

Donald R. GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for Glen Tulpin

Julien DeplanckeAgent
1 appearance

for Grand River Conservation Authority

Jennifer WrightAgent
1 appearance

for Haldimand County, the respondent

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

for herself

Connie CurtisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lois LockhartSelf-represented
1 appearance
Maria BonigutSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cindy SauveSelf-represented
1 appearance
Maja MielonenSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Robert CareySelf-represented
2 appearances
Martin BonigutSelf-represented
1 appearance
Milton SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Nick WallSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul GarrahSelf-represented
1 appearance
Perry AnglinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter HutchisonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ron GleasonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stuart GomesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sylvain GauthierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tom GivensSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ulrich SchaererSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor ReasbeckSelf-represented
1 appearance
Allan SimpsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bob KordybanSelf-represented
1 appearance
David DawsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Fernand GauthierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Garry BeachSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gary RupkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Guy DurocherSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself and Robert and Annette Anderson

Bruce ChrustieSelf-represented
1 appearance

for J. & B.P. Van Beets, Petitioner

Ike Van BeetsAgent
1 appearance

for Kenneth and Lynda Anderson

Dennis H. AsherCounsel
1 appearance

for K. Smart Associates Ltd.

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for Lawrence and Connie Curtis

Adam WhiteCounsel
1 appearance
Ian DonnellCounsel
1 appearance

for Maria Janzen

Suzanna JanzenAgent
1 appearance

for Martin and Maria Bonigut

Dr. William ConradAgent
1 appearance

former Deputy Reeve

Lawrie WepplerSelf-represented
1 appearance

former Reeve of the municipality

Denis PommainvilleSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Michael Brausam, assessed landowner

Valerie M’GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Montreal Soaring Council, assessed landowner

Walter EkiertAgent
1 appearance

for Mr. Carl King

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for Ms. Cindy Sauve and assessed landowners

Andrew RobinsonAgent
1 appearance

for Perry Anglin

Aimee AnglinAgent
1 appearance

for R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited

Jeremy TaylorAgent
1 appearance
Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance

for Robert and David Groszeibl, Joseph and Elizabeth Groszeibl, and Mr. William Van Vliet

Christopher WilsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ron Gleason

Kelly YerxaCounsel
1 appearance

for Sure Fresh Foods Inc.

Andrew HealCounsel
1 appearance
Hank Van VoorstAgent
1 appearance

for Sylvain Gauthier

Misty GauthierSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Tampa Farms Ltd., K. Fowler, B.&M. Vandenberg, B. Vandenberg, H. Stoelinga, R. Graham, F.&R. Graham, J.&R. Graham, Oakwood Agromart Ltd., 1035485 Ontario Ltd., G. Butterworth et al., J. Everson, J. Garland, J.&J. Hickson and J. Hickson

William TurvilleCounsel
2 appearances

for Tampa Farms Ltd., K. Fowler, B.&M. Vandenberg, B. Vandenberg, H. Stoelinga, R.&L. Graham and J.&R. Graham

William TurvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant

Peter KlijnSelf-represented
2 appearances
Keith VanderbekeAgent
1 appearance
Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance
Sheldon PettleCounsel
1 appearance
Tony DecooAgent
1 appearance
Barry CardCounsel
1 appearance
Carl MulockSelf-represented
1 appearance
David JohnstonAgent
1 appearance
Donald JefferyAgent
1 appearance
Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance
John LangloisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Appellant

Ashok SoodAgent
1 appearance
Danny BranoffAgent
1 appearance
Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant landowner

Ken TovellSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellant Milton Smith

Bryon WiebeAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant, Mr. Carl King

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Paul and Nancy Brown

John WiebeAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants

April ComazzoloSelf-represented
1 appearance
David RobySelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ComazzoloSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne HatchSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael L. FowlerCounsel
1 appearance
Norm SutherlandAgent
1 appearance
Robert F. HatchSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vic SauroAgent
1 appearance

for the Appellants

Arthur SimpsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jacqueline SimpsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Numerous appellantsSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellants, Arnold and Sandra Abrams

Allard ColynAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants, Finlay and Edith McCormick

Rod McCormickAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants, Heinz and Christine Probst

Thomas RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants Louise Tiemersma, Marjorie Tiemersma, Geoffrey Bradley, Christine Bradley

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants Orland and Freida Dippel

Stephen DippelAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants, Ralph & Shirley Clayton

Ralph ClaytonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Appellant, the OMTA

David BrisbinCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant, the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Kawartha Lakes

R. J. SwainCounsel
1 appearance
Valerie M’GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Kingston

Jim EnglishAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Ottawa

Cathy CrosbyCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Port Colborne

Bryon WiebeAgent
1 appearance
Cam MilneAgent
1 appearance
Rene LandryAgent
1 appearance

for the City of St. Thomas

Burt LongAgent
1 appearance

for the County of Simcoe

Jim HunterAgent
1 appearance
Shari ElliotCounsel
1 appearance

for the DFO

Dave NolanAgent
1 appearance
John CoreAgent
1 appearance

for the Estate of Harold Yeo

Lenus YeoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Estate of Henry Houser Vanderburgh, appellant

Malcolm VanderburghAgent
1 appearance

for the municipality

John D. ValleeAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality

Bruce CrozierAgent
1 appearance
Denise DeforgeAgent
1 appearance
Dennis ShandAgent
1 appearance
Jim RenickCounsel
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Richard StevensAgent
1 appearance
Wray RamsayAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Central Elgin

Donald LietchAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Central Huron

Geoff KingAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich, respondent

Wybe CnossenAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Thames Centre

David BroadCounsel
2 appearances
D. BroadCounsel
1 appearance

for the Municipality of West Perth

Jim DemerlingAgent
1 appearance
Ken ClarkeAgent
1 appearance
Patricia TaylorAgent
1 appearance

for the OFCTGMB, the respondent

Barry BresnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the OMTA

John WishartAgent
1 appearance

for the owners of roll numbers 660-036 and 660-037

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

George BanksCounsel
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
Laura EdenAgent
1 appearance
Ron SwainCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Municipality of North Perth

Andrew OsyanyAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, Municipality of Southwest Middlesex

Dennis McCreadyAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the City of Kawartha Lakes

Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance
Valerie M’GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the City of London

Phillip McNeelyAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, The Corporation of the Township of Perth East

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the DFO

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Municipality of West Elgin

Dennis R. McCreadyAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of Amherstburg

Bruce CrozierAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh

J. A. McBrideAgent
1 appearance
J. R. DicksonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Malahide

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Melancthon

Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Norfolk

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Peter Bryan-PulhamAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Wainfleet

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Ralph BradleyAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of West Grey

William J. MannerowAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Town of Caledon

Nadia KoltunCounsel
1 appearance

for the Town of Newmarket and the Town of East Gwillimbury

Susan PlamondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Town of New Tecumseth

William D. TurvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh

Valerie M'GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of King

Josie MateraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Leeds and Thousand Islands

John A. TrudgenAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Middlesex Centre, respondent

Andrew WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Norfolk

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Southwold

Brent ClutterbuckAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Wainfleet

George BanksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township, the respondent

Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance

for the upstream agricultural appellants

Janet McGuigan KellyCounsel
1 appearance

for Westview Church

George BartlettAgent
1 appearance

landowner

Donna MichlowskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Everett GrotenhuisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gordon SouthSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margaret WenzelSelf-represented
1 appearance

Landowner

David DouglasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wayne LeggeSelf-represented
1 appearance

late appellant

Jennifer NossSelf-represented
1 appearance

legal counsel for Township of Blandford-Blenheim - Respondent

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

on behalf of Donna Whitlock, appellant

Leonard WhitlockSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of Gary Beach, assessed landowner

Al FrasierAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Judith McDonald, assessed landowner, appellant

Robert GottAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Maurice Cheveaux, assessed landowner

Andrew DegrootAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Mr. J. Swain, assessed landowner

Mary QuinnAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant

David JohnsonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellants

Melodie FoersterAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Municipality

Janisse ZimmermanAgent
1 appearance
Patrick HaggittAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Municipality of West Perth

Mike KraemerAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Orr Lake Golf Club, assessed landowner

Jason HarrisAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Municipality of Chatham-Kent

Enio P. SulloAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Nation Municipality

Neil LevacAgent
1 appearance
Stéphane LeclercAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Town of Essex

Don JoudreyAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Ahfield-Colborne-Wawanosh

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township of Brock

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township of Southwold

M.P. De VosAgent
1 appearance
Ralph BeharrellAgent
1 appearance

Partner of Maja Mielonen

Guy NielenAgent
1 appearance

P. Eng.

Bryon WeibeAgent
1 appearance
Kent SchachowskojAgent
1 appearance

principal of Mancini Homes, the appellant

Angelo ManciniAgent
1 appearance

Public Works Superintendent for the Township of Adjala-Tosorntio

Jim MossAgent
1 appearance

Reeve of Municipality

Richard StephensAgent
1 appearance

Reeve, Township of Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh

Ben Van DiepenbeekAgent
1 appearance

représentant l’appelant

Noël BerthiaumeAgent
1 appearance

representative for Dunford Royal Cattle Company Inc. – Appellant

Casey FantaAgent
1 appearance

Representative for Garry Beach

Al FrasierAgent
2 appearances

representative of 1494883 Ontario Limited, assessed landowner

David OliverAgent
1 appearance

representative of Cuddy Farms, assessed landowner

John CameronAgent
1 appearance

representative of Leanne Landers and Stephen Herman, appellants

Barbara HermanAgent
1 appearance

representative of upstream agricultural owners

John McGuiganAgent
1 appearance

representing 91869 Ontario Incorporated, appellant Rick Fischuk, appellant

Bob RobinsonAgent
1 appearance

representing 918969 Ontario Incorporated, appellant

Bob RobinsonAgent
1 appearance

representing appellants Richard Gosselin and Garry Beach, and assessed landowner Sylvain Gauthier

Al FraserAgent
1 appearance

representing assessed landowner Anna Isley

John IsleyAgent
1 appearance

representing assessed landowner Frank Iannialice

Jack DavisAgent
1 appearance

representing Cytec Canada Inc., appellant

George SlaneyAgent
1 appearance

representing Cytec Canada Inc., appellant Helmut Rempel, appellant

George SlaneyAgent
1 appearance

representing Daryll and Lyle Betts (Roll No. 40-090) and Darta Farms Ltd (Roll No. 40-075), Walter and Katherine Betts (Roll Nos. 40-074 and 40-092), assessed upstream landowners

Andy McBrideAgent
1 appearance

representing D. & K. Loucks, M. & K. Dimitrick, W. & B. Reid, V. & S. Chanyi, G. DeWit, T. Buys, R. Zweers, W. Zweers, S Fielder & C. Agnew, M. Leal, R. & L. Vanbesien, P. Reid, R. Tipping, J. Woulters, T. Moonen and M. Mitchell.

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

representing Efelar Holdings Ltd., assessed landowner

Frank RothAgent
1 appearance

representing Henry Hauser estate, appellant John Grimo, appellant

Malcolm VanderburghAgent
1 appearance

representing James Dean, appellant

Mark NowakAgent
1 appearance

representing Margaret Mitchell, assessed landowner 15 Charles St.

Allen BuddenAgent
1 appearance

representing Percy Steele, assessed landowner

Jack SteeleAgent
1 appearance

representing Provincial Construction (Niagara Falls) Ltd.

Sam KitsonAgent
1 appearance

representing R.J.Burnside & Associates Ltd. (the "Engineer")

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

representing Royal Bourdeau and René Giroux, Jean-Claude Pavan, Ralph (Rapheal) Gour, Royal Bourdeau, René Giroux, appellants

Jean MartelCounsel
1 appearance

representing Shevaun Day, an appellant

Steve VoisinAgent
1 appearance

representing the appellants in the appeal Elite Swine and Cold Springs Farm Ltd. and also representing Progressive Pork Producer’s Co-operative Inc., Selves Farms Limited and Synergy Services Inc.

Robert ShapiroCounsel
1 appearance

representing the City of Kawartha Lakes

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

representing the municipality

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

representing the Municipality

André DesjardinsAgent
1 appearance

representing the respondent in the appeal, the OPPMB

Sean ForanCounsel
1 appearance

representing the respondent, the City of Kawartha Lakes

Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance

representing Walynn Enterprises Inc., appellant

Tracy BakerAgent
1 appearance

Secretary/Treasurer of 517749 Ontario Ltd on behalf of Mr. Mario Valletta, assessed landowner in the Elliott Drain watershed

Lucy VallettaAgent
1 appearance

Spouse of Perry Anglin, Appellant

Aimee AnglinAgent
1 appearance

Tampa Bay Farms, assessed landowner

Terry ParkerSelf-represented
1 appearance

witness

Keith BathoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ronald BaileyAgent
1 appearance

witness for the Municipality

Greg DemingAgent
1 appearance

118

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

0.7

cases/mo

OAFRAAT118(100%)

Decision types

appeal

102

motion

Page 6 of 6 (118 cases)