George Barrett

The applicant sought minor variances to permit the construction of an eight-unit stacked dwelling, requiring reductions in lot width, front and rear yard setbacks, landscape area, and parking spaces.

The Committee of Adjustment applied the four-part test under subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act.

Finding that the proposal fits well in the area, respects the neighbourhood character, and represents orderly development without unacceptable adverse impacts, the Committee granted the application.

The applicant sought consent under section 53 of the Planning Act to sever a property into two separate parcels to create separate ownership for a proposed semi-detached dwelling.

The Committee of Adjustment found that a plan of subdivision was not necessary for the proper and orderly development of the municipality.

The Committee was satisfied that the proposal was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and had adequate regard for the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The application was granted subject to conditions.

The applicant applied for minor variances to permit the construction of an eight-unit stacked dwelling.

The requested variances included reductions in lot width, front and rear yard setbacks, rear yard landscape area, and parking spaces.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the variances met the four-part test under subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act, as they were minor, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintained the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

The application was granted.

The applicant sought minor variances to reduce the rear yard setback and rear yard area to enclose an existing porch at the rear of a detached dwelling.

The Committee of Adjustment applied the four-part test under section 45(1) of the Planning Act.

Finding no objections and noting the City Planning Report raised no concerns, the Committee concluded the variances were minor, desirable, and maintained the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

The application was granted.

The applicant sought consent under Section 53 of the Planning Act for a lot line adjustment and to grant easements/rights-of-way to facilitate the construction of an eight-unit stacked dwelling.

The Committee of Adjustment found the proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and in conformity with the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The application was granted subject to conditions, including the consolidation of the severed land with the abutting property and the execution of a Joint Use, Maintenance and Common Elements Agreement.

The applicant sought a minor variance to permit a reduced rear yard setback of 4.5 metres for 55% of the lot width, whereas the Zoning By-law permitted this reduction for a maximum of 50% of the lot width.

The variance was requested to accommodate a specific dwelling design chosen by potential purchasers in a new subdivision.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the variance met the four-part test under the Planning Act, noting that the rear of the property abutted a river, reducing the potential for overlook.

The application was granted, with two members dissenting.

The applicant sought minor variances to convert an existing carport into an attached garage, requiring reductions in the rear yard setback, rear yard area, and front yard setback.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the requested variances met the four-part test under subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act, as they were minor, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintained the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

The application was granted.

The applicants sought a minor variance to permit a reduced rear yard setback of 4.5 metres for 55% of the lot width for a new detached dwelling.

The Committee of Adjustment applied the four-part test under subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act.

The majority of the Committee found that the variance was minor, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintained the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

The application was granted, with two members dissenting.

The Ottawa Hospital applied to the Committee of Adjustment for consent to enter into a long-term lease (75 years) and establish associated easements and rights-of-way to construct a seniors' retirement community on a portion of its property.

The City's Planning Department had no concerns.

The Committee found the application consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The application for consent was granted subject to conditions.

The applicant, Barrhaven Conservancy Development Corporation, applied for a minor variance to reduce the rear yard setback for a detached dwelling at 338 Peninsula Road.

The requested variance sought a reduced rear yard setback of 4.5 metres for 55% of the lot width, whereas the Zoning By-law permitted this reduction for a maximum of 50% of the lot width.

The Committee of Adjustment, by a majority, found that the variance met the four-part test under subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act, noting that the rear yard amenity area would still exceed the minimum requirement and that there was no evidence of adverse impacts on neighbouring properties.

The application was granted.

The applicant, Greenbelt Baptist Church, applied to the Committee of Adjustment for consent to sever its property to create one new lot for future development, and to establish an easement/right-of-way and a joint-use and maintenance agreement.

The applicant objected to a proposed condition requiring evidence that the severed and retained parcels could accommodate independent services, arguing it was onerous since the eventual use was unknown.

The Committee found the condition necessary and reasonable.

The Committee was satisfied that the application met the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act and was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement.

The applications for consent were granted subject to conditions.

The applicant sought consent to sever its property into two parcels to construct a new school, with the retained lands to be merged with an abutting parcel.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the proposal was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, had regard for matters of provincial interest, and satisfied the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The application for consent was granted subject to conditions, including the demolition of the existing dwelling and the merging of the retained lands.

The applicants sought a minor variance under section 45 of the Planning Act to permit the construction of a detached dwelling with a front-facing attached garage, which was not permitted under the Zoning By-law due to a Streetscape Character Analysis.

The Committee of Adjustment considered the application and found that it met the four-part test under the Planning Act.

The variance was deemed minor, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

The application was granted, subject to the construction being in accordance with the filed plans.

The applicant, 6382924 Canada Inc., applied for a minor variance to permit a reduced residential parking space rate of 1.1 parking spaces per dwelling unit for a residential tower under construction, whereas the Zoning By-law requires 1.2 spaces.

The Committee of Adjustment considered the application under the four-part test of subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act.

Finding that the variance was minor, desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and maintained the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, the Committee granted the application.

The applicant sought minor variances to permit an increased building height and reduced ground floor glazing for a proposed three-storey low-rise apartment building.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the requested variances met the four-part test under subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act.

The proposal was deemed desirable for the appropriate development of the land, maintained the general intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and was considered minor with no unacceptable adverse impacts on the neighbourhood.

The application was granted.

The applicant, 2473493 Ontario Inc., applied to the Committee of Adjustment for consent to sever a property into two separate parcels to create a new lot for a proposed three-storey low-rise apartment building, while retaining three existing apartment buildings on the other parcel.

The application included the creation of easements for vehicular and pedestrian access.

The Committee found that the proposal was consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, had adequate regard for matters of provincial interest, and met the criteria under subsection 51(24) of the Planning Act.

The Committee granted the provisional consent subject to several conditions, including cash-in-lieu of parkland, servicing plans, grading and drainage plans, and road widening conveyances.

The applicant sought a minor variance to reduce the required parking space rate for a proposed mixed-use development from 1.2 to 1.04 spaces per dwelling unit.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the requested variance met the four-part test under subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act, noting that the reduction in parking spaces supports Official Plan policies encouraging a shift away from automobile-centred development.

The application was granted.

The applicant sought minor variances to subdivide a property into two parcels for the construction of a semi-detached dwelling, requiring reductions in minimum lot area, front yard setback, and rear yard setback.

The Committee of Adjustment found that the requested variances met the four-part test under subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act, noting that the proposal fits well in the area, respects the character of the neighbourhood, and represents orderly development without creating unacceptable adverse impacts.

The applications were granted.

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment for consent to sever a property into two separate parcels to construct a semi-detached dwelling.

The Committee considered the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act and found the proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement.

The application was granted subject to several conditions, including the approval of concurrent minor variance applications and the execution of a joint use and maintenance agreement.

The applicants sought a minor variance to permit a reduced rear yard setback of 4 metres, whereas the Zoning By-law requires a minimum of 7.5 metres, to construct a sunroom at the rear of the existing dwelling.

The Committee of Adjustment evaluated the application under the four-part test of subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act.

Finding no objections and noting the proposal fits well within the area without adverse impacts, the Committee concluded the variance was minor, desirable, and maintained the general intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

The application was granted.