Committee of Adjustment
Comité de dérogation
DECISION
MINOR VARIANCE / PERMISSION
Date of Decision: April 12, 2024
Panel: 2 - Suburban
File No(s).: D08-02-24/A-00039
Application: Minor Variance under section 45 of the Planning Act
Owner(s)/Applicant(s): Barrhaven Conservancy Development Corporation & Argo (Jock River) Ltd.
Property Address: 250 Sapling Grove
Ward: 3 – Barrhaven West
Legal Description: Lot 156, Registered Plan 4M-1736
Zoning: R3YY [2766]
Zoning By-law: 2008-250
Hearing Date: April 2, 2024, in person and by videoconference
APPLICANT’S PROPOSAL AND PURPOSE OF THE APPLICATION
1The Owners want to construct a new detached dwelling, as shown on plans filed with the Committee.
REQUESTED VARIANCES:
2The Owner/Applicant requires the Committee’s authorization for a minor variance from the Zoning By-law to permit a rear yard setback of 4.5 metres, for 55% of the lot width, the total area of the rear yard must not be less than 54 square metres whereas the By-law permits a reduced rear yard setback of 4.5 metres for a maximum of 50% of the lot width, the total area of the rear yard must not be less than 54 square metres.
PUBLIC HEARING
Oral Submissions Summary
3Tim Eisner and Daniel Rokin, Agents for the Applicant, provided an overview of the application, and confirmed requested variance is to provide a design option on the subject property that was selected by potential purchasers within the new subdivision. Mr. Eisner highlighted that, despite the requested variance, the rear yard area amenity area will be larger than required under the Zoning By-law.
4City Planner Penelope Horn was also present.
5Following the public hearing, the Committee reserved its decision.
DECISION AND REASONS OF THE COMMITTEE: APPLICATION GRANTED
Application Must Satisfy Statutory Four-Part Test
6The Committee has the power to authorize a minor variance from the provisions of the Zoning By-law if, in its opinion, the application meets all four requirements under subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act. It requires consideration of whether the variance is minor, is desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure, and whether the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law are maintained.
Evidence
7Evidence considered by the Committee included any oral submissions made at the hearing, as highlighted above, and the following written submissions held on file with the Secretary-Treasurer and available from the Committee Coordinator upon request:
Application and supporting documents, including cover letter, parcel register, planning rationale, plans, photo of the posted sign, and a sign posting declaration.
City Planning Report received March 27, 2024, with no concerns.
Rideau Valley Conservation Authority email received March 27, 2024, with no objections.
Hydro Ottawa email received March 26, 2024, with no comments.
Ottawa Macdonald-Cartier International Airport Authority email received March 20, 2024, with no comments.
Ministry of Transportation email received March 22, 2024.
Effect of Submissions on Decision
8The Committee considered all written and oral submissions relating to the application in making its decision and granted the application.
9Based on the evidence, the majority of the Committee (Members J. Baltz and J. Wright dissenting) are satisfied that the requested variance meets all four requirements under subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act.
10The Committee notes that the City’s Planning Report raises “no concerns” regarding the application, highlighting that, “[t]he intent of the R3YY zone, which are amongst others, to ensure that adequate amenity area is provided and to minimize the potential for overlook. The reduced rear yard setback still provides a rear yard which exceeds the 54 square metre requirement.”
11The majority of the Committee also notes that no evidence was presented that the variance would result in any unacceptable adverse impact on neighbouring properties.
12Considering the circumstances, the majority of the Committee finds that, because the proposal fits well in the area, the requested variance is, from a planning and public interest point of view, desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure on the property, and relative to the neighbouring lands.
13The majority of Committee also finds that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan because the proposal respects the character of the neighbourhood.
14In addition, the majority of Committee finds that the requested variance maintains the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law because the proposal represents orderly development that is compatible with the surrounding area.
15Moreover, the majority of Committee finds that the requested variance is minor because it will not create any unacceptable adverse impact on abutting properties or the neighbourhood in general.
16THE COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT therefore authorizes the requested variance, subject to the location and size of the proposed construction being in accordance with the site plan filed, Committee of Adjustment date stamped February 29, 2024, and the elevations filed, Committee of Adjustment date stamped February 29, 2024, as they relate to the requested variance.
“Fabian Poulin” FABIAN POULIN VICE-CHAIR
Dissent JAY BALTZ MEMBER
“George Barrett” GEORGE BARRETT MEMBER
“Heather MacLean” HEATHER MACLEAN MEMBER
Dissent JULIANNE WRIGHT MEMBER
I certify this is a true copy of the Decision of the Committee of Adjustment of the City of Ottawa, dated April 12, 2024.
“Michel Bellemare” MICHEL BELLEMARE SECRETARY-TREASURER
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
To appeal this decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT), a completed appeal form along with payment must be received by the Secretary-Treasurer of the Committee of Adjustment by May 2, 2024, delivered by email at cofa@ottawa.ca and/or by mail or courier to the following address:
Secretary-Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment, 101 Centrepointe Drive, 4th floor, Ottawa, Ontario, K2G 5K7
The Appeal Form is available on the OLT website at https://olt.gov.on.ca/. The Ontario Land Tribunal has established a filing fee of $400.00 per type of application with an additional filing fee of $25.00 for each secondary application. Payment can be made by certified cheque or money order made payable to the Ontario Minister of Finance, or by credit card. Please indicate on the Appeal Form if you wish to pay by credit card. If you have any questions about the appeal process, please contact the Committee of Adjustment office by calling 613-580-2436 or by email at cofa@ottawa.ca.
Only the applicant, the Minister or a specified person or public body that has an interest in the matter may appeal the decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal. A “specified person” does not include an individual or a community association.
There are no provisions for the Committee of Adjustment or the Ontario Land Tribunal to extend the statutory deadline to file an appeal. If the deadline is not met, the OLT does not have the authority to hold a hearing to consider your appeal.
Ce document est également offert en français.
Committee of Adjustment City of Ottawa Ottawa.ca/CommitteeofAdjustment cofa@ottawa.ca 613-580-2436
Comité de dérogation Ville d’Ottawa Ottawa.ca/Comitedederogation cded@ottawa.ca 613-580-2436