Dybesh Regmi, M.D.

The Appellant appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend his driver's licence under section 47(1) of the Highway Traffic Act due to a medical condition report indicating renal disease and unstable mental illness.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the Appellant's non-compliance with his dialysis treatment had led to episodes of delirium, which significantly interfered with his ability to drive safely.

The Tribunal confirmed the Registrar's decision to suspend the licence.

The appellant appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend his driver's licence under section 47(1) of the Highway Traffic Act due to a reported diagnosis of alcohol dependence.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the appellant had not maintained a sufficient period of abstinence from alcohol to demonstrate stability, having consumed alcohol while enrolled in a withdrawal management program.

The Tribunal concluded that the appellant's condition was likely to significantly interfere with his ability to operate a motor vehicle safely and confirmed the Registrar's decision to suspend the licence.

The appellant appealed a decision of the Registrar of Motor Vehicles to suspend her driver's licence under section 47(1) of the Highway Traffic Act.

The suspension followed a medical condition report indicating alcohol abuse after the appellant was involved in a motor vehicle collision.

The appellant argued that she was not intoxicated at the time of the collision, had abstained from alcohol since the incident, and her liver enzymes had normalized.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the appellant had a history of elevated liver enzymes due to alcohol use, establishing an addiction.

Although the appellant showed progress by abstaining for a short period, the Tribunal concluded that the addiction was not sufficiently stabilized, as she had not attended counselling or an alcohol treatment program.

The Tribunal confirmed the Registrar's decision to suspend the licence.

The Appellant appealed the Registrar of Motor Vehicles' decision to suspend his driver's licence following a breakthrough seizure.

The seizure occurred after nearly four years of being seizure-free and was attributed to sleep deprivation.

The Ministry of Transportation maintained the suspension, relying on the CCMTA guideline requiring a six-month seizure-free period.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the Appellant, who had increased his medication and was highly compliant and insightful regarding his condition, did not suffer from a medical condition likely to significantly interfere with his ability to drive safely.

The Tribunal set aside the Registrar's decision to suspend the licence.