A dental discipline panel found professional misconduct where the registrant planned and performed unnecessary oral surgery on a minor under general anaesthesia after reviewing another patient's CBCT scan and failing to review the patient chart.
The panel also found that informed consent was not obtained because the discussion of the procedure was insufficient, the written consent referred to the wrong tooth, and consent was not re-confirmed on the day of surgery.
Accepting a joint submission, the panel ordered a reprimand, completion of an informed-consent course, practice monitoring, and costs.
A publication ban protected the identity of patients named in the notice of hearing and agreed statement of facts.