Craig Mazerolle

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing, but the applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence, nor did they request an extension.

The Tribunal proceeded in the applicant's absence pursuant to s. 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act.

Finding that the applicant failed to meet their burden of proof, the Tribunal dismissed the application.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing, but the applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence, nor did they request an extension.

The Tribunal proceeded in the applicant's absence pursuant to section 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act.

Finding that the applicant failed to meet their burden of proof to demonstrate removal from the Minor Injury Guideline and entitlement to the disputed medical benefits, the Tribunal dismissed the application.

The applicant sought attendant care benefits, medical benefits, and interest following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing, but the applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet their evidentiary burden and dismissed the application.

A motion by the respondent to dismiss the application was deemed moot.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, disputing the respondent's determination that her injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline.

The Tribunal scheduled a written hearing, but the applicant, whose representative had previously withdrawn, failed to submit any evidence or submissions.

Proceeding in the applicant's absence under section 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, the Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet her burden of proof.

The application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing, but the applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence.

The applicant's former representative had previously withdrawn and confirmed the applicant was notified.

The Tribunal proceeded in the applicant's absence pursuant to section 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act.

As the applicant failed to meet his burden of proof, the application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing before the Licence Appeal Tribunal.

The applicant failed to file any written submissions or evidence by the required deadline and did not seek an extension.

Consequently, the Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet their evidentiary burden and dismissed the application.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, including a treatment plan for psychological services, an award under s. 10 of O. Reg. 664, and interest.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing.

Neither the applicant nor the respondent filed any submissions or evidence.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet their evidentiary burden and dismissed the application.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing, but the applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence after their representative withdrew.

Pursuant to section 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, the Tribunal proceeded in the applicant's absence.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet their burden of proof to demonstrate removal from the Minor Injury Guideline or entitlement to the claimed benefits.

The application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a 2014 motor vehicle accident.

The respondent argued the application was barred because the parties had executed a full-and-final settlement in November 2016.

The applicant contended he lacked the mental capacity to enter into the settlement agreement at that time.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's contemporaneous academic records and cognitive test scores demonstrated he had the capacity to understand the agreement and instruct counsel.

The Tribunal held the settlement was valid and dismissed the application pursuant to s. 9.1(8) of Regulation 664.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing, but the applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence and did not request an extension.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet the onus of demonstrating removal from the Minor Injury Guideline or entitlement to the disputed assessments, an award, and interest.

The application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident but failed to file any written submissions or evidence for the scheduled written hearing.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal proceeded in the applicant's absence pursuant to s. 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act.

Finding that the applicant failed to meet the burden of proving entitlement to removal from the Minor Injury Guideline and the claimed medical benefits, the Tribunal dismissed the application.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The respondent denied the benefits, and the matter proceeded to a written hearing before the Licence Appeal Tribunal.

The applicant failed to file any written submissions or evidence by the deadline and did not request an extension.

Pursuant to section 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, the Tribunal proceeded in the applicant's absence.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet the burden of demonstrating removal from the Minor Injury Guideline or entitlement to the disputed medical benefit, award, and interest.

The application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing, but the applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence.

The Tribunal proceeded in the applicant's absence pursuant to s. 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act.

Finding that the applicant failed to meet the burden of proving entitlement to the claimed benefits, the Tribunal dismissed the application.

The respondent's request for costs was denied, as the applicant's failure to file submissions did not meet the high threshold of unreasonable, frivolous, or bad faith conduct.

The applicant applied to the Licence Appeal Tribunal for resolution of a dispute over statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter was scheduled for a written hearing.

The applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence by the deadline, and no motion was brought to extend the time.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to meet her evidentiary burden to demonstrate entitlement to the disputed income replacement benefit, medical benefits, and interest.

The application was dismissed.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a 2010 motor vehicle accident.

The insurer raised a preliminary issue that the applicant was statute-barred from proceeding with her application for income replacement and housekeeping benefits due to the expiry of the two-year limitation period under s. 56 of the Schedule.

The Tribunal found that the initial January 2011 letter was a valid denial for both benefits.

However, because the insurer subsequently reinstated the income replacement benefit in February 2011, the limitation period for that benefit was restarted and a subsequent termination without a dispute resolution form did not trigger a new limitation period.

The applicant was therefore barred from proceeding with the housekeeping benefit claim, but permitted to proceed with the income replacement benefit claim.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing, but the applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence, and their representative had previously withdrawn.

The Tribunal proceeded in the applicant's absence under section 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act.

The application was dismissed as the applicant failed to meet their burden of proving entitlement to the claimed benefits.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The Tribunal scheduled a written hearing, but the applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence, nor did they request an extension.

Pursuant to section 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, the Tribunal proceeded in the applicant's absence.

Finding that the applicant failed to meet their burden of demonstrating entitlement to the disputed benefits, the Tribunal dismissed the application.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The Tribunal scheduled a written hearing, but the applicant failed to file any submissions or evidence, nor did they request an extension.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed.

Pursuant to section 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, the Tribunal proceeded in the applicant's absence.

Finding that the applicant failed to meet their burden of proof to demonstrate removal from the Minor Injury Guideline and entitlement to the disputed benefits, the Tribunal dismissed the application.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

A written hearing was scheduled, but the applicant failed to file submissions by the deadline and instead requested a 12-week adjournment, citing delays in obtaining productions.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment request, finding it untimely and unsupported by evidence of efforts to obtain the productions.

Proceeding in the applicant's absence pursuant to section 7(2) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, the Tribunal dismissed the application because the applicant failed to meet her burden of proof regarding removal from the Minor Injury Guideline and entitlement to the disputed benefits.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.

The matter proceeded to a written hearing, but the applicant failed to file submissions or evidence.

The Tribunal proceeded in the applicant's absence under the Statutory Powers Procedure Act and dismissed the application for failing to meet the burden of proof.

The respondent's request for costs was denied, as the applicant's breach of deadlines did not meet the high threshold for a costs award.