Request for review dismissed; scheduling orders are not final decisions reviewable under Rule 120.
The appellant requested a review of a Board disposition that set the Commencement Day for a number of assessment appeals.
The Board considered whether the disposition was a 'final decision' subject to review under Rule 120 of the Assessment Review Board's Rules of Practice and Procedure.
The Board held that the disposition was an interlocutory scheduling order, not a final decision on the merits, and therefore could not be reviewed under Rule 120.
The request for review was dismissed.
Request for review dismissed; scheduling dispositions are not final decisions subject to review under Rule 120.
The Board considered whether a scheduling disposition qualifies as a 'final decision' under Rule 120 of the Assessment Review Board's Rules of Practice and Procedure.
The Board held that procedural rulings and scheduling orders do not finally dispose of the merits of a case and are therefore not subject to review under Rule 120.
Procedural order issued for concurrent CRB and OMB hearings regarding heritage designation and planning appeals.
The Conservation Review Board and Ontario Municipal Board issued a procedural order for concurrent hearings regarding a property in the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury.
The owners appealed the Town's failure to make a decision on consent applications, appealed a minor variance application, and objected to a notice of intention to designate the property under the Ontario Heritage Act.
The order sets the hearing dates, order of evidence, and disclosure requirements.