Motion for costs dismissed as respondents' conduct was not clearly unreasonable, frivolous, vexatious, or in bad faith.
Following a decision by the Normal Farm Practices Protection Board regarding noise and vibration disturbances, the applicants brought a motion for costs against the respondents.
The Board considered written submissions and determined that the respondents' conduct did not meet the threshold of being clearly unreasonable, frivolous, vexatious, or in bad faith under Section 66(1) of the Board's Rules of Practice and Procedure.
The motion for costs was dismissed.