The applicant, Noel Paragua, sought to terminate his spousal support obligation to the respondent, Silva Lola, following his retirement, arguing it constituted a material change in circumstances.
He also sought extended terms for reimbursing a joint debt.
The respondent opposed, asserting the retirement was not involuntary and the applicant's income was not materially different.
The court dismissed the applicant's motion to change, finding he failed to establish a material change in circumstances, particularly that his retirement was involuntary or that his income had materially decreased.
The court also rejected arguments for reducing the applicant's income due to "double-recovery" or imputing income to the respondent.
The applicant was ordered to reimburse the respondent for his share of a joint debt with specific payment terms.