Aarij Ahmed

The applicant, a unit owner, challenged the respondent condominium corporation's visitor parking rules, enforcement practices, and record retention methods.

The applicant had repeatedly parked her vehicle in visitor parking spaces, leading the respondent to issue compliance letters and a chargeback for legal fees.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal found that the visitor parking rules were reasonable and enforceable, and that the applicant had violated them.

The Tribunal also found the respondent's enforcement practices were reasonable and denied the applicant's request for records, as it was made to avoid enforcement.

The applicant was ordered to comply with the parking rules and pay $2,600 in costs to the respondent.

The applicant condominium corporation filed an application against the respondent owner for breaching rules regarding noise and smoking.

The respondent did not participate in the written hearing.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal accepted the applicant's evidence that the respondent caused unreasonable noise and smoked in his unit and on the common elements, creating a nuisance.

The Tribunal ordered the respondent to comply with the rules and pay $3,400 in costs, including legal fees and compliance costs.

The applicant condominium corporation brought an application against the unit owners and their tenant to seek compliance with its rules respecting smoking.

The parties reached a settlement through the Condominium Authority Tribunal's online dispute resolution system.

The Tribunal issued a consent order requiring the tenant to abide by the smoking rules, the owners to take reasonable steps to ensure compliance, and the respondents to reimburse the applicant $150 for filing fees.