2 total
Request to stay human rights application dismissed as concurrent civil action did not raise Code issues.
The respondents requested to defer or stay the human rights application, arguing that the applicant had commenced a duplicative civil action in the Superior Court of Justice.
The Tribunal found that the civil action, which sought damages for physical injuries from falling, did not raise human rights allegations or seek remedies for Code violations.
The request to defer or stay the application was dismissed.
Applicant ordered to produce psychiatric records relevant to his claim for mental anguish damages.
The respondents requested an order for the production of the applicant's psychiatric records, arguing they were relevant to his claims of mental anguish resulting from alleged discrimination.
The applicant opposed the request.
The Tribunal ordered the applicant to produce arguably relevant medical records from his psychiatrist from one year prior to the alleged incident to the present, finding them relevant to both liability and remedy.
The Tribunal also declined to bifurcate the hearing between liability and remedy.
