The accused was charged with robbery after allegedly taking fentanyl patches from a 67-year-old complainant at his rural home.
The accused admitted to taking the patches but claimed it was part of a pre-arranged drug transaction to settle a debt.
The court rejected the accused's testimony due to inconsistencies and her prior statement to police denying involvement.
Applying the W.D. framework, the court accepted the complainant's evidence that the accused and an accomplice smashed his door window and threatened him with a gun to obtain the fentanyl.
The accused was found guilty of robbery.
