The plaintiff employee was terminated without cause after 8.5 months of employment.
The defendant employer argued that a termination clause in the employment agreement limited the plaintiff's entitlements to the statutory minimums under the Employment Standards Act.
On cross-motions for summary judgment, the court found the termination clause ambiguous as it merely stated the employer would comply with the legislation without explicitly displacing common law rights.
Applying the principle of contra proferentem, the court interpreted the clause against the employer and awarded the plaintiff 4 months' pay in lieu of reasonable notice, plus one month of pension contributions.