Aragon brought an application for a declaration that Piller and its tenants were obstructing Aragon's right of way over an L-shaped parcel of land.
Piller brought a cross-application claiming it had acquired possessory title to the L-shaped land and a portion of Aragon's land through adverse possession by its tenants, and that Aragon had abandoned its right of way.
The court found that Piller's tenants, as trespassers, did not meet the high threshold for adverse possession, particularly the inconsistent use requirement, as their use was not inconsistent with the servient owner's intended use.
Furthermore, the court found no evidence that Aragon or its predecessors intended to abandon the expressly granted right of way.
Aragon's application was granted, and Piller's cross-application was dismissed.
Piller was ordered to remove the obstructions.
