The applicant union applied for certification.
A group of objecting employees filed petition cards expressing opposition to the union.
The union challenged the voluntariness of these petition cards, arguing they were tainted by an earlier petition circulated in circumstances that might have created a perception of management involvement.
The majority of the Board found that the employer's behaviour was restrained and there was no evidence of management involvement in the origination or circulation of the petitions.
The Board concluded the petition cards represented a voluntary expression of employee wishes and directed a representation vote.
One Board member dissented, finding the second petition tainted by the flaws of the first.