The parties separated after a 19-year marriage.
The respondent claimed compensatory spousal support, arguing he suffered economic disadvantage while the applicant pursued her master's degree, which led to a significant increase in her income.
The court dismissed the spousal support claim, finding no economic disadvantage to the respondent.
The court also resolved disputes over the children's primary residence for child support purposes, ordered pro-rata sharing of section 7 extraordinary expenses, and determined the equalization of net family property, noting the respondent's failure to disclose certain assets.
